ArticleMicrobiology spectrum2025
Streamlined extraction of nucleic acids and metabolites from low- and high-biomass samples using isopropanol and matrix tubes.
Article in Microbiology spectrum, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Optimizing methods for virome analysis based on studies of a synthetic viral community.mSystems · 2026Article
- Basic Microbiome Analysis: Analytical Steps from Sampling to Sequencing.Microorganisms · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
22 authors.
Funding
Abstract
An essential aspect of population-based research is collecting samples outside of a clinical setting. This is crucial because microbial populations are highly dynamic, varying significantly across hosts, environments, and time points, a variability that clinical sample collection alone cannot fully capture. At-home sample collection enables the inclusion of a larger and more diverse group of participants, accounting for differences in ethnicity, age, and other factors. However, managing large studies is challenging due to the complexities involved in sample acquisition, processing, and analysis. Building on our previous work demonstrating the effectiveness of single 1 mL barcoded, racked Matrix Tubes in reducing sample processing time and well-to-well contamination for paired DNA and metabolite extraction, we further validate this method against a previously benchmarked plate-based approach using the same extraction reagents. This validation focuses on samples from the built environment, human skin, human saliva, and feces from mice and humans. Importantly, we explore the impact of using a mix of bead sizes during bead-beating for cell lysis, demonstrating that it enhances taxonomic recovery compared to a single bead size. Finally, we assess the potential of 95% isopropanol for room-temperature sample preservation. Our results show that isopropanol performs comparably to 95% ethanol in many cases, suggesting it is viable as an alternative when ethanol is unavailable. Beyond minimizing contamination, halving processing time, eliminating human error during sample plating, and streamlining metadata curation, the Matrix tube approach produces metabolomic, 16S, and shotgun metagenomic data consistent with the Plate-based Method for both high- and low-biomass samples. IMPORTANCE: Numerous studies have linked the microbiome to human and environmental health, yet many fundamental questions remain unanswered. Large-scale studies with robust statistical power are required to identify important covariates against a background of confounding factors. Cross-contamination, limited throughput, and human error have been identified as major setbacks when processing large numbers of samples. We present a streamlined method for sample accession and extraction of metabolites and DNA for both high- and low-biomass samples. This approach, previously shown to significantly reduce cross-contamination, employs an automation-friendly, single barcoded tube per sample. Additionally, we demonstrate that 95% isopropanol serves as an effective ambient-temperature storage solution for many sample types, providing an alternative in regions where ethanol is unavailable or restricted. This method has significant implications for the field, enabling large-scale studies to generate accurate insights with greater efficiency and expanded accessibility in situations in which ethanol is more costly or otherwise not available.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.