Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41070691›Full record

ReviewCurrent opinion in anaesthesiology2025

The evolving landscape of airway education in anesthesia for head and neck surgery.

Alexander Fuchs, Vladimir Nekhendzy, Robert Greif

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current opinion in anaesthesiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Alexander FuchsDepartment of Anaesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
Vladimir NekhendzyDepartment of Anesthesiology, Perioperative and Pain Medicine, Stanford University Medical Center, Stanford, California, USA.
Robert GreifFaculty of Medicine, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of reviewAirway management for head and neck surgery presents some of the most unique and complex challenges for both adult and pediatric patient populations. High level of technical proficiency is essential, and the technical skill set should be complemented by a variety of solid nontechnical skills to ensure adequate interdisciplinary and interprofessional collaboration. Little is known about state-of-the-art teaching methods addressing these important skills. RECENT

findingsThis article explores recent advancements in airway education, focusing on how technical and nontechnical skills could be best integrated into head and neck anesthesia teaching curricula with the goals of optimizing airway management outcomes and patient safety. SUMMARY: We examined the role of simulation-based training, competency-based medical education, and the emphasis on human factors in head and neck anesthesia to facilitate shaping modern curricula.

Indexed as

Airway ManagementAnesthesiaAnesthesiologyHeadClinical CompetenceCompetency-Based EducationCurriculumHumansNeckSimulation Trainingdifficult airwayear nose and throat anesthesiaeducationhead and neck anesthesiahead and neck surgeryteaching

Identifiers

PMID41070691
PMCPMC12573680

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.