ArticleJournal of oral & facial pain and headache2025
Family history of bruxism: a case-control study based on the ecological momentary assessment of awake bruxism.
Article in Journal of oral & facial pain and headache, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundIn everyday clinical practice, the screening of specific genes for awake bruxism (AB) is not a sustainable and feasible practice; most of the time, the only information that clinicians can rely on is investigating the family history of bruxism. Nevertheless, little is known about the relationship between the reported history and AB frequency. The aim of the present paper is to assess the existence of any differences in the frequency of self-reported AB behaviors between healthy young individuals with and without a positive report of family history of bruxism.
methodsParticipants were recruited within the community of the University of Siena by advertising the possibility of taking part in the investigation through the academic website and mail. All the participants performed a seven-day monitoring of the frequency of self-reported AB via the ecological momentary assessment (EMA). Moreover, for the assessment of bruxism family history, participants were asked to fill out a short questionnaire taken from the Standardized Tool for the Assessment of Bruxism (STAB).
resultsThe final sample was composed of 117 individuals (32 males and 85 females, mean age 22.3 ± 2.3). Of the total amount of participants, 48.7% reported a positive family history of bruxism. The Mann-Whitney U test showed a statistically significant difference in the reported frequency of all AB behaviors (
conclusionsBased on these findings, clinicians are recommended to not underestimate a positive family history of bruxism, as it can be an indicator of an ongoing AB.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.