ArticleTurk psikiyatri dergisi = Turkish journal of psychiatry2025
Cognitive and Metacognitive Determinants of Psychopathology in Individuals with Physical Disabilities: A Comparative Study with a Healthy Control Group.
Article in Turk psikiyatri dergisi = Turkish journal of psychiatry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveDisability extends beyond physical limitations, impacting individuals’ mental health and psychosocial adjustment. This study aimed to investigate the underlying cognitive and metacognitive processes contributing to psychopathological symptoms in individuals with physical disabilities.
methodWe included 164 individuals with physical disabilities and 149 healthy controls. Psychopathology was measured using the 21 item Depression, Anxiety, and Stress Scale (DASS21). Cognitive and metacognitive processes were assessed using the Negative Core Beliefs Inventory (NCBI), Cognitive and Behavioural Processes Questionnaire (CBP-Q), and Cognitive Attentional Syndrome 1 Scale (CAS-1).
resultsComparative analyses showed no significant difference in DASS21 total scores (p>0.05). The CAS-1 total score was significantly lower in individuals with physical disabilities (p<0.05). Moderate, positive, and significant correlations were found between DASS21 and NCBI, CBP-Q, and CAS-1 (p<0.05). Multiple linear regression analysis revealed that NCBI and CAS-1 significantly influenced depression levels (p<0.05), while CBP-Q had no effect (p>0.05).
conclusionPsychopathology in individuals with physical disabilities is associated with cognitive and metacognitive processes. Our results could inform the development of psychosocial interventions and improve health policies for this population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.