Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41070508›Full record

ArticleTurk psikiyatri dergisi = Turkish journal of psychiatry2025

Effect of Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation on Neurocognitive Functions in Moderate and Severe Depression: A Follow-up Study.

Gökçe Kavak Sinanoğlu, Özkan Güler, Zeynep Çaliş

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Turk psikiyatri dergisi = Turkish journal of psychiatry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Gökçe Kavak Sinanoğlu
Özkan Güler
Zeynep Çaliş

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveWe aimed to investigate the effects of transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) on depressive symptoms and neurocognitive functions during treatment and follow-up.

methodsA total of 65 patients diagnosed with major depressive disorder, with a >16 scores in Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (Ham-D) and a >18 scores in Beck Depression Inventory (BDI), participated in the study. The Ham-D, BDI, Beck Anxiety Inventory (BAI), Trail Making Tests A and B, Stroop Colour and Word Test, Number Sequence Test, Öktem Verbal Memory Processes Test, and Verbal Fluency Test were administered at baseline, 1st-, and 3rd-month for both treatment and control groups.

resultsA total of 65 patients were enrolled in the study, of whom 25 in the TMS group and 26 in the non-TMS group completed the followup. At the first month, 73.5% of patients in the TMS group showed a full treatment response, compared to 29.03% in the non-TMS group (p=0.001). At the third month, the treatment response rate decreased to 40% in the TMS group, whereas it was 42.3% in the non-TMS group, and the significant difference between the groups disappeared (p=0.918). In terms of cognitive functions, no significant changes were observed in either group at the first- and third-month follow-ups compared to baseline.

conclusionTMS had a strong acute antidepressant effect; however, this effect diminished over time during the follow-up period. Although partial improvement was observed in cognitive functions, this improvement did not reach statistical significance.

Indexed as

CognitionMajor Depressive DisorderTranscranial Magnetic StimulationAdultFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansMaleMiddle AgedNeuropsychological TestsPsychiatric Status Rating ScalesSeverity of Illness IndexTreatment OutcomeCognitive functionsmajor depressive disorder transcranial magnetic stimulation.

Identifiers

PMID41070508
PMCPMC12434896

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.