ArticleTurk psikiyatri dergisi = Turkish journal of psychiatry2025
Assesment of Clinical Reasoning in Psychiatric Education: Development of Multiple-Choice Questions with Automatic Item Generation in Turkish.
Article in Turk psikiyatri dergisi = Turkish journal of psychiatry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Artificial intelligence in radiology examinations: a psychometric comparison of question generation methods.Diagnostic and interventional radiology (Ankara, Turkey) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveThis study aims to evaluate the suitability of the automatic item generation (AIG) for producing Turkish case-based multiplechoice questions (MCQs) in psychiatry.
methodThe study was planned as a descriptive study. In the first stage, topics were determined and a cognitive model was created by subject matter experts. In the second stage, a question template was created, variables were determined, the format of answer options was organized, and two equivalent templates of question content with different combinations were created. In the final stage, questions were generated using Python-based software based on these models. Following the question generation, random samples were selected and evaluated by experienced educators using a structured form.
resultsA total of 1189 questions were generated, with 11 questions sampled for each diagnosis. In the evaluation conducted by experts, six of the questions were deemed appropriate for each parameter, while minor corrections were suggested for five questions. It was stated that all the questions assess clinical reasoning skills rather than factual recall.
conclusionThe template-based AIG method allows for the rapid and effective production of high-quality questions needed in medical education. The study demonstrated that AIG in the Turkish language for generating MCQs that assess clinical reasoning is applicable in the field of psychiatry. This method enables the production of a large number of questions in a short time, enriched with various combinations. Keyword: Automated item generation, clinical reasoning, medical education, multiple choice question, psychiatry education.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.