ArticleJournal of global health2025
Combined and interaction effects of outdoor and reading time on myopia onset: evidence from over 210 000 schoolchildren in China.
Article in Journal of global health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Exposure-response association between outdoor activity time and myopia risk in Chinese children and adolescents: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Journal of global health · 2026Pooled it
- Beyond Screen Time: A Measurement Framework for Behavioral Exposures in Childhood Myopia.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Myopia as a Global Public Health Challenge a Narrative Review.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Prevalence and Associated Factors of Self-Reported Myopia Among Undergraduate Students in the Northern Region of Bangladesh: A Cross-Sectional Study.Health science reports · 2026Article
- A unifying theory of brain signaling and its possible role in acquired chronic disease.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2026Article
- Identifying and Managing Pre-Myopia: A Narrative Review.Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2026Review
- Axial length changes and baseline predictors over five years in children treated with orthokeratology lenses: a retrospective cohort study.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2026Article
- Establishing and validating a predictive model for long-term control outcomes following orthokeratology lenses wear: a five-year cohort study.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: While numerous studies have examined the individual effects of outdoor and reading time on myopia, the interaction between these factors in large populations remains underexplored. We hypothesised that increased outdoor exposure may mitigate the risk of myopia associated with prolonged reading. Methods: We included 219 802 initially non-myopic primary school students in the Tianjin Child and Adolescent Research of Eye study. We collected the behaviour exposure data via a questionnaire. We used Cox proportional hazard models, with semesters since entrance as the time scale, to assess the associations of outdoor and reading time with the onset of myopia. We evaluated interaction effects on the additive scale using a generalised propensity score-weighted Cox model, and quantified them by excess relative risk due to interaction (RERI), attributable proportion (AP), and synergy index (SI). Additionally, we conducted subgroup analyses to assess the robustness and consistency of the results. Results: Among the 219 802 children, 130 246 developed myopia, resulting in a cumulative incidence of 59.3% over three years. Increased outdoor time of 1-2 hours (hazard ratio (HR) = 0.97; 95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.95, 0.98), 2-3 hours (HR = 0.90; 95% CI = 0.88, 0.92), and >3 hours (HR = 0.86; 95% CI = 0.84, 0.89) were associated with a reduced risk of myopia onset, whereas prolonged reading time of 1-2 hours (HR = 1.02; 95% CI = 1.01, 1.03), >2 hours (HR = 1.03; 95% CI = 1.01, 1.05), and >3 hours (HR = 1.05; 95% CI = 1.03, 1.08) were linked to an increased risk. The interaction effects on the additive scale were significant between outdoor time and reading time with RERI of -0.04 (95% CI = -0.08, 0.00), AP of -0.04 (95% CI = -0.07, 0.00), and SI of 0.71 (95% CI = 0.50, -0.93), particularly in boys, those in grades from 1 to 3, and those with myopic parents. Conclusions: Outdoor time and reading time are not only independently related to the onset of myopia but also interact with each other. These findings highlight the importance of promoting outdoor time and managing reading time to inform targeted myopia prevention strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.