Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41070425›Full record

ArticleJournal of global health2025

Combined and interaction effects of outdoor and reading time on myopia onset: evidence from over 210 000 schoolchildren in China.

Jing Li, Shengxin Liu, Ying Zhu, Desheng Song, Nan Jin, Chunyu Tang, Xuan Li, Bo Zhang, Jiarui Su, Ruihua Wei and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of global health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Identifying and Managing Pre-Myopia: A Narrative Review.Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2026
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Jing Li *Tianjin Key Laboratory of Retinal Functions and Diseases, Tianjin Branch of National Clinical Research Center for Ocular Disease, Eye Institute and School of Optometry, Tianjin Medical University Eye Hospital, Tianjin, China.
Shengxin Liu *Tianjin University of Tradition Chinese Medicine, Tianjin, China.
Ying Zhu *Tianjin Key Laboratory of Retinal Functions and Diseases, Tianjin Branch of National Clinical Research Center for Ocular Disease, Eye Institute and School of Optometry, Tianjin Medical University Eye Hospital, Tianjin, China.
Desheng SongTianjin Key Laboratory of Retinal Functions and Diseases, Tianjin Branch of National Clinical Research Center for Ocular Disease, Eye Institute and School of Optometry, Tianjin Medical University Eye Hospital, Tianjin, China.
Nan JinTianjin Key Laboratory of Retinal Functions and Diseases, Tianjin Branch of National Clinical Research Center for Ocular Disease, Eye Institute and School of Optometry, Tianjin Medical University Eye Hospital, Tianjin, China.
Chunyu TangTianjin Key Laboratory of Retinal Functions and Diseases, Tianjin Branch of National Clinical Research Center for Ocular Disease, Eye Institute and School of Optometry, Tianjin Medical University Eye Hospital, Tianjin, China.
Xuan LiTianjin Key Laboratory of Retinal Functions and Diseases, Tianjin Branch of National Clinical Research Center for Ocular Disease, Eye Institute and School of Optometry, Tianjin Medical University Eye Hospital, Tianjin, China.
Bo ZhangTianjin Key Laboratory of Retinal Functions and Diseases, Tianjin Branch of National Clinical Research Center for Ocular Disease, Eye Institute and School of Optometry, Tianjin Medical University Eye Hospital, Tianjin, China.
Jiarui SuTianjin Medical University, Tianjin, China.
Ruihua WeiTianjin Key Laboratory of Retinal Functions and Diseases, Tianjin Branch of National Clinical Research Center for Ocular Disease, Eye Institute and School of Optometry, Tianjin Medical University Eye Hospital, Tianjin, China.
Bei DuTianjin Key Laboratory of Retinal Functions and Diseases, Tianjin Branch of National Clinical Research Center for Ocular Disease, Eye Institute and School of Optometry, Tianjin Medical University Eye Hospital, Tianjin, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: While numerous studies have examined the individual effects of outdoor and reading time on myopia, the interaction between these factors in large populations remains underexplored. We hypothesised that increased outdoor exposure may mitigate the risk of myopia associated with prolonged reading. Methods: We included 219 802 initially non-myopic primary school students in the Tianjin Child and Adolescent Research of Eye study. We collected the behaviour exposure data via a questionnaire. We used Cox proportional hazard models, with semesters since entrance as the time scale, to assess the associations of outdoor and reading time with the onset of myopia. We evaluated interaction effects on the additive scale using a generalised propensity score-weighted Cox model, and quantified them by excess relative risk due to interaction (RERI), attributable proportion (AP), and synergy index (SI). Additionally, we conducted subgroup analyses to assess the robustness and consistency of the results. Results: Among the 219 802 children, 130 246 developed myopia, resulting in a cumulative incidence of 59.3% over three years. Increased outdoor time of 1-2 hours (hazard ratio (HR) = 0.97; 95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.95, 0.98), 2-3 hours (HR = 0.90; 95% CI = 0.88, 0.92), and >3 hours (HR = 0.86; 95% CI = 0.84, 0.89) were associated with a reduced risk of myopia onset, whereas prolonged reading time of 1-2 hours (HR = 1.02; 95% CI = 1.01, 1.03), >2 hours (HR = 1.03; 95% CI = 1.01, 1.05), and >3 hours (HR = 1.05; 95% CI = 1.03, 1.08) were linked to an increased risk. The interaction effects on the additive scale were significant between outdoor time and reading time with RERI of -0.04 (95% CI = -0.08, 0.00), AP of -0.04 (95% CI = -0.07, 0.00), and SI of 0.71 (95% CI = 0.50, -0.93), particularly in boys, those in grades from 1 to 3, and those with myopic parents. Conclusions: Outdoor time and reading time are not only independently related to the onset of myopia but also interact with each other. These findings highlight the importance of promoting outdoor time and managing reading time to inform targeted myopia prevention strategies.

Indexed as

MyopiaReadingAdolescentChildChinaFemaleHumansIncidenceMaleProportional Hazards ModelsRisk FactorsSurveys and QuestionnairesTime Factors

Identifiers

PMID41070425
PMCPMC12512000

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.