Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41070396›Full record

ArticleJournal of veterinary emergency and critical care (San Antonio, Tex. : 2001)

Retrospective Evaluation of Blood Product Transfusion Outcomes and Risk Factors for Transfusion Reactions in Dogs at a Veterinary Teaching Hospital With an Established Blood Bank: 137 Dogs (2018-2022).

Neline G Holm, Lise N Nielsen, Rebecca Langhorn

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of veterinary emergency and critical care (San Antonio, Tex. : 2001). The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Neline G HolmDepartment of Veterinary Clinical Sciences, Faculty of Health & Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Frederiksberg, Denmark.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9752-9247
Lise N NielsenDepartment of Veterinary Clinical Sciences, Faculty of Health & Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Frederiksberg, Denmark.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3988-0979
Rebecca LanghornDepartment of Veterinary Clinical Sciences, Faculty of Health & Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Frederiksberg, Denmark.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7833-5191

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo evaluate the outcome of blood transfusions in dogs and identify the incidence of and risk factors associated with transfusion reactions (TRs) classified according to the Association of Veterinary Hematology and Transfusion Medicine (AVHTM) consensus.

designRetrospective cross-sectional study with cohort analysis, January 2018-March 2022.

settingVeterinary teaching hospital with a well-established blood bank. ANIMALS: One hundred thirty-seven dogs.

interventionsNone. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN

resultsMedical records and transfusion logs of dogs receiving blood transfusions were reviewed. Transfusion outcomes and TRs were assessed according to predefined definitions, TRs as classified by the AVHTM consensus. Two hundred seventeen transfused units (TUs) and 190 transfusion events were documented. Transfusion outcome was successful for 29.5%, moderately improved for 23.7%, and not improved for 9.4% transfusions. The definitions proved especially informative when applied to indications for which a large number of patients received blood products, showing that transfusions generally improved clinical and laboratory parameters in anemia, hypoalbuminemia, and hemostatic dysfunction associated with angiostrongylosis. TRs occurred in 12.4% patients, the most common being an acute hemolytic TR (13/21 of all TRs [61.9%]). TR imputability (cause) was definite for 3 of 21 (14.2%), probable for 16 (76.2%), and possible for 2 (9.6%) TUs. TRs were more common with red blood cell (RBC)-containing products (p ≤ 0.0001) and in dogs with immune-mediated hemolytic anemia (IMHA) (p = 0.002). No associations were found between TRs and administered dose (p = 0.8), transfusion rate (p = 0.053), packed RBC age (p = 0.3), or patient transfusion history (p = 0.3). There were more successful outcomes for transfusions without a TR (p = 0.008; odds ratio: 6.3, 95% confidence interval: 1.6-28.6).

conclusionsUsing established outcome definitions, outcome was successful in 29.5%. TRs were more common when RBC-containing products were administered and in dogs with IMHA.

Indexed as

Blood TransfusionDog DiseasesTransfusion ReactionAnimalsBlood BanksCross-Sectional StudiesDogsFemaleHospitals, AnimalHospitals, TeachingMaleRetrospective StudiesRisk Factorsanemiablood bankhemostatic disordertransfusion outcometransfusion reaction

Identifiers

PMID41070396
PMCPMC12614415

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.