ArticleFrontiers in veterinary science2025
Prevalence and antimicrobial drug resistance of gram-negative bacteria in dairy feed and water: a One Health concern.
Article in Frontiers in veterinary science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Exploring the antibacterial and antibiofilm potential of 1,8-cineole against Escherichia coli through in vitro, gene expression, and in silico analyses.Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's archives of pharmacology · 2026Article
- Antimicrobial resistance patterns ofFrontiers in veterinary science · 2026Article
- Antimicrobial resistance in Gram-negative bacteria from retail meat: Prevalence and public health implications.PloS one · 2026Article
- Epidemiological insights into virulence and antimicrobial resistance ofFrontiers in veterinary science · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Dairy animals are continually at risk of infection due to exposure to contaminated environments, particularly through feed and water. The presence of Materials and methods: A total of 160 samples, comprising 98 feed and 49 water samples, were collected from dairy farms. Isolates were identified using Gram staining, motility testing, and endospore staining, followed by confirmation with standard biochemical tests (IMViC). Antimicrobial susceptibility testing was carried out, and Multiple Antibiotic Resistance Index (MARI) values were calculated. Results: Of the 144 analyzable samples, 76 (51.7%) tested positive for E. coli and 68 (46.3%) for Conclusion: The comparable prevalence and resistance patterns of
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.