ArticleJB & JS open access
Disparities in Patient-Reported Healthcare Affordability and Access Among Arthroplasty Patients in the All of Us Database.
Article in JB & JS open access. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: While racial and ethnic disparities in postoperative outcomes for total hip and knee arthroplasty (THA/TKA) are well-documented, a significant gap remains in understanding patient-reported barriers to care. This study investigates racial and ethnic disparities in self-reported barriers to health care among THA/TKA patients. Methods: This cross-sectional study used data from the All of Us Research Program. Adult patients undergoing THA or TKA were identified using Current Procedural Terminology codes. Multivariable logistic regression was used to analyze 11 self-reported barriers across racial/ethnic groups (non-Hispanic White, Black, Hispanic, and Other). Odds ratios (ORs) were calculated from models after adjusting for age, sex, and/or neighborhood-level Community Deprivation Index (CDI). Results: A total of 4,419 patients were analyzed: 3,706 (83.9%) White, 325 (7.4%) Black, 235 (5.3%) Hispanic, and 153 (3.5%) Other. After adjusting for age, sex, and CDI, Black patients had significantly higher odds of delaying care because of cost of follow-up (OR 2.01, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.26-3.21), general visits (OR 2.07, 95% CI 1.24-3.47), and co-pays (OR 2.31, 95% CI 1.44-3.71). Both Black (OR 1.99, 95% CI 1.32-2.98) and Hispanic (OR 1.79, 95% CI 1.13-2.82) patients had significantly higher odds of experiencing transportation-related delays. Conclusion: Significant racial and ethnic disparities in affordability and access persist among THA/TKA patients, even after controlling for neighborhood-level socioeconomic deprivation. Black and Hispanic patients experience multifaceted barriers, underscoring that interventions should address not only individual patient circumstances but also structural community-level factors to achieve equitable arthroplasty care. Level of Evidence: Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.