Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41070323›Full record

ArticlePakistan journal of medical sciences2025

Epidemiology and related risk factors of prolonged QT interval in neonates.

Yu Hong, Yongmei Wang, Qin Zhou, Min Wang, Jing Zhou

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Pakistan journal of medical sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Yu HongYu Hong Department of Pediatrics, The People's Hospital of Suzhou New District, Suzhou 215000, Jiangsu, China.
Yongmei WangYongmei Wang Department of Pediatrics, The People's Hospital of Suzhou New District, Suzhou 215000, Jiangsu, China.
Qin ZhouQin Zhou Department of Pediatrics, The People's Hospital of Suzhou New District, Suzhou 215000, Jiangsu, China.
Min WangMin Wang Department of Pediatrics, The People's Hospital of Suzhou New District, Suzhou 215000, Jiangsu, China.
Jing ZhouJing Zhou Department of Pediatrics, The People's Hospital of Suzhou New District, Suzhou 215000, Jiangsu, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: To investigate the epidemiology and related risk factors of prolonged QT interval (PQTI) in neonates. Methodology: This was a retrospective study. A cohort of one thousand neonates admitted to the Obstetrics and Neonatology department of The People's Hospital of Suzhou New District from January 2021 to December 2023 was enrolled in the study. Neonates were categorized into four groups based on their birth gestational age: healthy full-term group, diseased full-term group, healthy preterm group, and diseased preterm group. The incidence of PQTI in neonates across these group was observed, compared and investigated the risk factors for PQTI. The diagnostic value of QTcHod, QTcFri, and QTcFra was assessed using Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curve analysis. Results: Among the 1,000 neonates, 51(5.10%) exhibited PQTI. The incidence of PQTI was 0.98% (7/714) for Group-1, 3.64%(2/55) for Group-2, 15.05%(28/186) for Group-3, and 31.11%(14/45) for Group-4. Statistically significant differences were observed in the incidence of PQTI between the four groups(χ² = 137.637, Conclusion: PQTI is relatively uncommon in neonates. Birth gestational age, 1-minute Apgar score, 5-minute Apgar score, PROM, fetal distress, QTcHod, QTcFri, and QTcFra are significant risk factors for PQTI in neonates.

Indexed as

EpidemiologyInfluencing factorNeonateProlonged QT interval

Identifiers

PMID41070323
PMCPMC12505946

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.