Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41070310›Full record

ArticlePakistan journal of medical sciences2025

Evaluation of pharmacist's interventions in a Hospital Pharmacy of a Secondary Care Centre of Aga Khan University Hospital.

Afia Tariq Butt, Ayesha Feeroze, Iyad Naeem, Sumaira Khadim

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Pakistan journal of medical sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Afia Tariq ButtAfia Tariq Butt, FCPS Senior Instructor, Department of Pediatric Medicine and Child Health, Aga Khan University Hospital, Karachi, Pakistan.
Ayesha FeerozeAyesha Feeroze, Pharm-D Department of Pharmacy, Aga Khan Hospital for Women, Karachi, Pakistan.
Iyad NaeemIyad Naeem, Ph.D Professor, Head of Department, Pharmaceutics, University of Karachi, Pakistan.
Sumaira KhadimSumaira Khadim, Ph.D Faculty of Pharmacy, Iqra University, Karachi, Pakistan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: The current study aimed to investigate pharmacists' intervention statistics in a secondary care setting in Pakistan. Methodology: A retrospective cross-sectional study was conducted at a secondary care facility of Aga Khan University, Karachi, Pakistan, analyzing in-patient and out-patient pharmacy records from June 2022 to June 2023. Results: The study analyzed records of 10.9% (n=1340) male and female patients with a median age of six years (IQR: 23 years). Pharmacists intervened in 99.1% (n=1329) of prescriptions due to prescribing errors (PEs). The most common intervention was therapy optimization (e.g., therapeutic drug monitoring, incomplete prescriptions, wrong doses/frequencies, updating drug allergies, following culture/sensitivity results and monitoring electrolytes), accounting for 72.4% (n=970) of interventions, followed by route conversion at 19.6% (n=263). The overall acceptance rate of pharmacists' interventions among physicians was 88.7% (n=1189). Conclusion: PEs were common and pharmacists' interventions were vital in preventing patient harm. PEs were more frequent among in-patients at risk of polypharmacy. Pharmacists optimized therapy across all age groups by adjusting doses, administration routes and applying restrictions. The study noted high acceptance of these interventions.

Indexed as

InterventionPrescribing errorSecondary care

Identifiers

PMID41070310
PMCPMC12505937

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.