ArticleInternational journal of clinical and health psychology : IJCHP
Individuals with autism have difficulties learning implicit sequences of social interactions that require mentalizing.
Article in International journal of clinical and health psychology : IJCHP. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Cerebellar anodal transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) improves implicit mentalizing sequence learning: A double-blind sham-controlled study.Cognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience · 2026Article
- Equifinal pathways and subtypes: a developmental neuroimaging perspective on social differences in autism.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2026Article
- Analysis of behavioral sequences in social interactions of autistic children: a latent class model based on structured play observation.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: This research investigated implicit social sequencing in adults with Autism Spectrum Disorder. Previous research emphasized the role of the cerebellum in autism, and in processing action sequences within social contexts requiring mental state attribution (mentalizing). We therefore hypothesized that individuals with autism would show reduced implicit sequencing in an interactive negotiation game that involves mentalizing. Methods: Participants included 20 adults with autism and 20 matched healthy controls. Using a novel ultimatum serial reaction time task, participants received offers for a division of 10 points from multiple proposers and responded as quickly as possible. Unbeknownst to the participants, offers were presented in repeated or random sequences. Additionally, the proposers' implied traits (egocentric versus generous offers) and the volatility of their offers (variable versus stable) were varied to assess context effects on implicit sequencing. Results: As expected, autistic participants revealed no significant speed differences between repeated and random sequences, while controls were faster in repeated sequences. Considering context effects, both groups were faster in repeated sequences when offers were stable (i.e., identical across trials). Conversely, when offers were volatile, responses slowed down under repeated sequences. Conclusion: Findings suggest reduced implicit social sequencing capacities in adults with autism. Social context factors influenced learning in both groups, indicating that autistic individuals may either perform at typical social levels when statistically controlling for their reduced sequencing capacities, or may sufficiently compensate under explicit task instructions. These results highlight social sequence learning as a promising target for intervention in training programs for autistic individuals.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.