ArticleImaging science in dentistry2025
Deep learning for dentomaxillofacial cone-beam computed tomography image quality enhancement: A pilot study.
Article in Imaging science in dentistry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: This study was conducted to develop and evaluate a deep learning-based super-resolution approach for enhancing the quality of cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) images in dentomaxillofacial imaging. Materials and Methods: A deep learning-based super-resolution method using the MIRNet-v2 model was developed to enhance CBCT image quality. The study used a dataset comprising 6,961 anonymized axial slices from 15 CBCT scans. High-resolution images served as ground truth, while low-resolution versions were created through artificial degradation, including downscaling, blurring, and noise addition. The model was evaluated using a 5-fold cross-validation strategy, employing peak signal-to-noise ratio (PSNR) and structural similarity index measure (SSIM) as metrics. Qualitative assessments conducted by 2 experienced radiologists involved criteria such as noise, sharpness, spatial resolution, and diagnostic quality, scored using a CBCT evaluation chart. Results: The model significantly improved degraded CBCT images across all evaluation metrics. Enhanced images demonstrated mean PSNR values exceeding 35 dB and SSIM values over 0.85, with the highest performance achieved for blurred images (PSNR: 43.86±1.61, SSIM: 0.98±0.01). Subjective assessments indicated improvements in diagnostic quality, noise reduction, and spatial resolution, with outputs comparable to the original images in several degradation scenarios. Interobserver reliability was fair (Cohen kappa: 0.335). Notable improvements were observed for noise and artifact reduction in specific degradation groups, suggesting improved diagnostic utility. Conclusion: Deep learning-based super-resolution demonstrates considerable potential for enhancing CBCT image quality, especially in scenarios involving blur and downscaling. These results suggest possible applications in low-dose imaging protocols and improved clinical decision-making.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.