Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41070250›Full record

ArticleImaging science in dentistry2025

Improving cervical maturation degree classification accuracy using a multi-stage deep learning approach.

Parisa Motie, Ali Ashkan, Hossein Mohammad-Rahimi, Sahel Hassanzadeh-Samani, Negar Razzaghi, Mohammad Behnaz, Shahriar Shahab, Saeed Reza Motamadian

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Imaging science in dentistry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Parisa MotieMedical Image and Signal Processing Research Center, Medical University of Isfahan, Isfahan, Iran.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5598-3575
Ali AshkanDepartment of Orthodontics, School of Dentistry, Hamadan University of Medical Sciences, Hamadan, Iran.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0008-4702-0275
Hossein Mohammad-RahimiTopic Group Dental Diagnostics and Digital Dentistry, ITU/WHO Focus Group AI on Health, Berlin, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4971-5926
Sahel Hassanzadeh-SamaniTopic Group Dental Diagnostics and Digital Dentistry, ITU/WHO Focus Group AI on Health, Berlin, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8448-5831
Negar RazzaghiCraniofacial Research Center, Tehran Islamic Azad University of Medical Sciences, Dental Branch, Tehran, Iran.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6935-1771
Mohammad BehnazDepartment of Orthodontics, School of Dentistry, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2763-3292
Shahriar ShahabDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology, Faculty of Dentistry, Shahed University, Tehran, Iran.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0355-3626
Saeed Reza MotamadianDentofacial Deformities Research Center, Research Institute of Dental Sciences, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Science, Tehran, Iran.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7337-2145

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: Classifying cervical vertebral maturation (CVM) stages aids in determining the peak period of growth and in predicting growth rates and patterns. This study aimed to develop a multistage framework for the automated classification of CVM. Materials and Methods: The dataset consisted of 2325 lateral cephalograms. Two orthodontists independently classified these images into 6 categories. One object detection model (Faster RCNN) and 2 classification models (ResNet 101) were implemented using the Python programming language and the PyTorch library. The first classification model divided images into 2 primary groups (CS1-CS3 and CS4-CS6) based on the morphology of the C4 vertebra. The second model subsequently classified each primary group into their respective subcategories. Each classification model was trained and evaluated using a 10-fold cross-validation strategy. The learning process of the models was visualized with gradient-weighted class activation maps. Results: The overall framework achieved an accuracy of 82.96%. Object detection for region-of-interest extraction reached mAP50 and mAP75 values of 100%. The first classification model demonstrated an accuracy of 99.10% on the hold-out test set. The classifier for CS1-CS3 images showed higher accuracy than the classifier for CS4-CS6 images (86.49% vs. 82.80%). Conclusion: The accuracy achieved by this fully automated framework was promising.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceCervical VertebraeClassificationDeep LearningGrowth

Identifiers

PMID41070250
PMCPMC12505443

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.