ArticleTobacco induced diseases2025
Effectiveness of online tobacco control education: A cross-sectional study among healthcare professionals.
Article in Tobacco induced diseases, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionOnline education platforms offer promising solutions for tobacco control capacity building. This study evaluated an online tobacco control course's effectiveness on healthcare professionals' knowledge, attitudes, and behavioral intentions.
methodsA cross-sectional survey was conducted among healthcare workers and medical students (n=719) in a Chinese city, January 2023. Participants were categorized as course participants (n=387) or non-participants (n=332). The validated survey instrument (Cronbach's α=0.963) assessed tobacco-related knowledge, attitudes, and behavioral intentions using 5-point Likert scales. Statistical analyses included t-tests, effect size, and multivariable regression.
resultsCourse participants demonstrated significantly higher knowledge scores across multiple domains compared to non-participants. Regarding specific tobacco harms, participants showed greater awareness that smoking causes stroke (4.21 ± 0.90 vs 3.86 ± 1.04, p<0.001, Cohen's d=0.37), heart disease (4.27 ± 0.85 vs 3.93 ± 1.03, p<0.001, d=0.36), and erectile dysfunction (4.05 ± 0.97 vs 3.72 ± 1.12, p<0.001, d=0.32). For secondhand smoke, participants better recognized risks of adult cardiovascular disease (4.26 ± 0.81 vs 4.04 ± 0.90, p=0.001, d=0.26) and pediatric respiratory illness (4.37 ± 0.73 vs 4.15 ± 0.83, p<0.001, d=0.28). Participants also showed more positive attitudes toward tobacco control policies and greater behavioral intentions for tobacco control advocacy. In multivariable analysis adjusting for demographics and smoking status, course participation remained significantly associated with higher knowledge scores (β=0.28; 95% CI: 0.18-0.38, p<0.001), more positive attitudes (β=0.22; 95% CI: 0.12-0.32, p<0.001), and stronger behavioral intentions (β=0.31; 95% CI: 0.19-0.43, p<0.001).
conclusionsThe online tobacco control course significantly improved participants' knowledge of tobacco harms and strengthened their support for tobacco control measures. These findings suggest that digital health education platforms may be valuable tools for tobacco control capacity building, though further longitudinal studies are needed to establish causal relationships and assess long-term effectiveness.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.