ArticleBMJ open sport & exercise medicine2025
Update on sport mental health assessment tool-1 false negative rates from the 2024 Paris Olympic and Paralympic Games.
Article in BMJ open sport & exercise medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- International Olympic Committee Sport Mental Health Assessment Tool 2 (IOC SMHAT2): development, content validity and feasibility.British journal of sports medicine · 2026Article
- Comprehensive integration of mental health screening and triage with mental performance services through a sport science hub model in collegiate sport.Discover mental health · 2026Review
- International Validity of the Athlete Psychological Strain Questionnaire (APSQ): A Scoping Review.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- An empirical study on lower limb exoskeleton robots improving athletic performance of disabled athletes through psychological mechanisms.Frontiers in psychology · 2026Article
- Global athlete mental health screening: cross-cultural validity of the athlete psychological strain questionnaire.Frontiers in psychology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: The Sport Mental Health Assessment Tool-1 (SMHAT-1) was developed to screen elite athletes for mental health concerns. Previous work demonstrated high false negative rates (FNRs) for the initial triage step of the tool, but given the novelty of the deployment of the SMHAT-1 during large multisport, multinational competitions, replication of these findings was justified and required. This study, therefore, aimed to recalculate classification performance metrics at the triage step and investigate potential reasons for the high FNRs observed. Methods: All athletes (n=847) completed steps 1 and 2, including an additional Posttraumatic Stress Disorder questionnaire, and FNRs were calculated. Exploratory analysis, including an exploratory factor analysis (EFA), was used to investigate the latent constructs being captured. Results: Classification performance metrics indicated FNRs ranging from 0% (Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ9) and PHQ9 Item 9) to 63.16% (Brief Eating Disorder in Athletes Questionnaire (BEDAQ)), consistent with previous findings. The EFA identified nine latent factors in step 2, with each instrument appearing to mostly favour its own independent factor, highlighting a range of distinct latent constructs. An exploratory mixed graphical model revealed some step 2 clusters that were not closely linked with the Athlete Psychological Strain Questionnaire (APSQ) items. Conclusions: These findings confirm previous concerns regarding the APSQ's sensitivity and underscore the challenge of using a single triage tool to capture the broad spectrum of mental health issues assessed by the SMHAT-1. Future work should consider a bespoke triage tool to better capture the diverse mental health needs of elite athletes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.