ArticleFrontiers in physiology2025
Multifidelity deep learning modeling of spatiotemporal lung mechanics.
Article in Frontiers in physiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Human lungs fluid mechanics: an overview of current modelling techniques.The European physical journal. E, Soft matter · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Digital twins of the respiratory system have shown promise in predicting the patient-specific response of lungs connected to mechanical ventilation. However, modeling the spatiotemporal response of the lung tissue through high-fidelity numerical simulations involves computing times that largely exceed those required in clinical applications. In this work, we present a multi-fidelity deep learning surrogate model to efficiently and accurately predict the poromechanical fields that arise in lungs connected to mechanical ventilation. Methods: We generate training datasets with two fidelity levels from non-linear finite-element simulations on coarse (low-fidelity) and fine (high-fidelity) discretizations of the lungs domain. Further, we reduce the output spatiotemporal dimensionality using singular value decomposition, capturing over 99% of the variance in both displacement and alveolar pressure fields with only a few principal components. Based on this procedure, we learn both the input-output mappings and fidelity correlations by training a reduced-order multi-fidelity neural network model (rMFNN) that leverages the abundant low-fidelity data to enhance predictions from scarce high-fidelity simulations. Results: Compared to a reduced-order single-fidelity neural network (rSFNN) surrogate, the rMFNN achieves superior predictive accuracy in predicting spatiotemporal displacement and alveolar pressure fields (R Discussion: These results demonstrate the potential of the rMFNN lung model to enable patient-specific predictions in acceptable computing times that can be used to personalize mechanical ventilation therapy in critical patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.