ArticleJHEP reports : innovation in hepatology2025
Cystic fibrosis liver disease progression in the era of elexacaftor-tezacaftor-ivacaftor.
Article in JHEP reports : innovation in hepatology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Cystic fibrosis care today-a narrative review based on views of experts, patients and the public.Wiener klinische Wochenschrift · 2026Review
- Real-World Effectiveness of Elexacaftor/Tezacaftor/Ivacaftor in Cystic Fibrosis: A 24-Month Italian National Registry Study.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Decoding liver injury in cystic fibrosis: How to tell drug-induced liver injury from cystic fibrosis liver disease.World journal of gastroenterology · 2026Review
- Elexacaftor-tezacaftor-ivacaftor and cystic fibrosis liver disease: A turning point that calls for cautious optimism.JHEP reports : innovation in hepatology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background & Aims: The effect of elexacaftor-tezacaftor-ivacaftor (ETI) on cystic fibrosis liver disease (CFLD) outcomes remains unknown. Thus, we investigated the association between the ETI rollout and trends in CFLD progression in a nationwide cohort. Methods: Using the French National Hospital Discharge Database (2014-2023), we measured the incidence of CFLD progression (decompensated cirrhosis, gastroesophageal variceal bleeding, primary liver cancer, or liver transplantation) before and after ETI became available (December 2019) in patients with cystic fibrosis (pwCF) aged ≥12 years. Death without CFLD progression and lung transplantation were treated as competing events. Incidence rates were compared across ETI calendar eras in both the full cohort and a 1:1 propensity score-matched sample. Analyses used Kaplan-Meier curves, Fine-Gray competing risk models, and adjusted incidence rate ratios (aIRRs). Results: The cohort included 10,083 pwCF (median age: 19 years [IQR 14-29]; 52.6% male), with 24.6% censored pre-ETI and 75.4% post-ETI. The overall incidence of CFLD progression was 3.7 per 1,000 person-years: 25.4 pre-ETI versus 1.2 post-ETI ( Conclusions: The incidence of CFLD progression declined during the ETI rollout. While these findings suggest an association between ETI availability and improved liver outcomes, unmeasured confounders and concurrent changes in management might have also contributed. Thus, further studies are needed to confirm causality and understand underlying mechanisms. Impact and implications: In this nationwide French cohort study of over 10,000 people with cystic fibrosis, we observed a significant decline in the incidence of cystic fibrosis liver disease outcomes following the rollout of elexacaftor-tezacaftor-ivacaftor (ETI) in December 2019. The rate dropped from 25.4 to 1.2 per 1,000 person-years post-ETI. Matched analyses confirmed a reduced risk of liver disease progression, with an adjusted incidence rate ratio of 0.28. Although the findings suggest ETI may improve liver outcomes in people with cystic fibrosis, potential confounding factors necessitate further research to establish causality and understand the underlying biological mechanisms.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.