Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41070092›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in cardiovascular medicine2025

The evolving landscape of restrictive cardiomyopathy treatment: clinical trial trends and future directions.

Bin Deng, Wenhua Liu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Bin DengDepartment of Cardiology, Shenzhen Bao'an Traditional Chinese Medicine Hospital Group, Shenzhen, Guangdong, China.
Wenhua LiuDepartment of Endocrinology, Shenzhen Bao'an Authentic TCM Therapy Hospital, Shenzhen, Guangdong, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Restrictive cardiomyopathy (RCM) is a rare form of heart muscle disease characterized predominantly by diastolic dysfunction and restrictive filling, for which no guideline-supported pharmacological treatment currently exists. We reviewed the clinical trial landscape for RCM to identify emerging therapeutic strategies and trends. Using the TrialTrove database, we identified 63 RCM-related clinical trials (2007-2024) after excluding studies of standard therapies or unrelated conditions. Our analysis shows that research interest in RCM has remained modest but steady, with many trials in early (Phase I) and late (Phase III/IV) stages. Transthyretin stabilizers, particularly tafamidis, accounted for a significant portion of these trials and have demonstrated improved cardiac function and outcomes in transthyretin amyloid cardiomyopathy (ATTR-CM). In addition, novel disease-modifying approaches - including antisense oligonucleotides, RNA interference therapies, and gene-editing strategies - are being explored in clinical trials, reflecting a shift towards targeted treatment of underlying causes. Approximately half of the identified trials have been completed, though a few were terminated early due to insufficient efficacy. These findings highlight a dynamic and evolving therapeutic landscape in RCM. While tafamidis has substantially advanced ATTR-CM management, emerging RNA-silencing and gene therapy techniques hold promise to address the unmet needs in RCM, warranting further large-scale studies to validate their safety and efficacy.

Indexed as

clinical trialsgene therapyrestrictive cardiomyopathytherapeutic landscapetransthyretin amyloid cardiomyopathy

Identifiers

PMID41070092
PMCPMC12504482

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.