ArticleFrontiers in oral health2025
Can haptic reinforced VR simulation transform preclinical pulpotomy training? Insights into skill acquisition, student perceptions, and educational impact: randomized controlled trial.
Article in Frontiers in oral health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Reimagining Dental Education: Integrating Digital Technologies for a Global, Digitally Native Generation-A Perspective.European journal of dentistry · 2026Article
- Design, Implementation, and Effectiveness of Virtual Reality and Digital Simulation Tools for Pediatric Dental Behavior Management Education: Systematic Review.JMIR serious games · 2026Review
- Comparative Performance of Haptic Virtual Simulation vs. Conventional Training in Class V Cavity Preparation: A Paired In Vitro Study.Dentistry journal · 2026Article
- Application of virtual reality haptic simulators in periodontics: insights from dental professionals.Frontiers in oral health · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Preclinical training in pediatric dentistry is essential for developing the psychomotor and cognitive skills required for procedures such as pulpotomies. Haptic virtual reality simulators (HVRS) are redefining dental training by providing real-time feedback, on-demand objective assessment, and expanded opportunities for skill development-making them powerful complements to traditional mannequin-based methods. However, evidence supporting their effectiveness in pediatric procedures remains limited. Methods: This randomized controlled study involved 173 third-year dental students who received prior instruction in both HVRS and conventional simulation. Participants were assigned to either a control group (traditional training only) or an experimental group (additional training with the Simodont® HVRS). All students then performed a standardized pulpotomy on a primary molar resin tooth. Performance was assessed across four technical criteria by blinded evaluators. Student perceptions of the HVRS experience were collected through a questionnaire. Results: No statistically significant differences were found between groups for cavity shape or conservative opening. However, the test group showed significantly higher scores in roof removal ( Conclusion: HVRS enhanced specific technical skills in pulpotomy, especially pulp chamber roof removal, and was positively perceived by students as a complementary tool in pediatric preclinical training.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.