ArticleAfrican journal of disability2025
Workplace narratives of South African employees with multiple sclerosis.
Article in African journal of disability, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Empowering yet challenging: managing multiple sclerosis in the workplace-an interview study.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Workplace inclusion for employees with chronic conditions such as multiple sclerosis (MS) remains a challenge because of the episodic and invisible nature of symptoms, leading to stigma, disclosure dilemmas and inadequate accommodations. Traditional approaches to disability inclusion often fail to address the lived realities of employees with MS, necessitating a deeper exploration of how individuals and organisations construct meaning around disability and inclusion. Objectives: This study explores how employees with MS experience workplace inclusion, self-management and disclosure drawing on sensemaking theory and the Social Model of Disability. The study also employs a reflexive approach, centring the voices of employees to generate actionable insights for employers and disability advocates. Method: An exploratory qualitative research design was adopted involving semi-structured interviews with 13 employees diagnosed with MS in South Africa. Thematic analysis was used to identify patterns related to workplace adaptability, disclosure and support structures. Researcher reflexivity was incorporated to acknowledge positionality and enhance the study's depth. Results: Workplace adaptability, including flexible work arrangements and empathetic leadership, play a critical role in ensuring inclusion for individuals with MS in the work environment. However, disclosure remains a complex decision influenced by stigma and workplace culture. Psychological safety and proactive organisational sensemaking significantly impact employees' experiences. Conclusion: For meaningful workplace inclusion, organisations must move beyond compliance-driven policies and foster an environment where employees with MS feel valued and supported. Contribution: By integrating reflexivity, sensemaking theory and the Social Model of Disability, this study offers valuable contributions to the discourse on disability inclusion.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.