Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41070038›Full record

ArticleAfrican journal of disability2025

Workplace narratives of South African employees with multiple sclerosis.

Armand Bam, Marco Bekker, Linda Ronnie

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in African journal of disability, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Armand BamStellenbosch Business School, Stellenbosch University, Cape Town, South Africa.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6074-7232
Marco BekkerStellenbosch Business School, Stellenbosch University, Cape Town, South Africa.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0005-1115-0447
Linda RonnieSchool of Management Studies, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6129-6595

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Workplace inclusion for employees with chronic conditions such as multiple sclerosis (MS) remains a challenge because of the episodic and invisible nature of symptoms, leading to stigma, disclosure dilemmas and inadequate accommodations. Traditional approaches to disability inclusion often fail to address the lived realities of employees with MS, necessitating a deeper exploration of how individuals and organisations construct meaning around disability and inclusion. Objectives: This study explores how employees with MS experience workplace inclusion, self-management and disclosure drawing on sensemaking theory and the Social Model of Disability. The study also employs a reflexive approach, centring the voices of employees to generate actionable insights for employers and disability advocates. Method: An exploratory qualitative research design was adopted involving semi-structured interviews with 13 employees diagnosed with MS in South Africa. Thematic analysis was used to identify patterns related to workplace adaptability, disclosure and support structures. Researcher reflexivity was incorporated to acknowledge positionality and enhance the study's depth. Results: Workplace adaptability, including flexible work arrangements and empathetic leadership, play a critical role in ensuring inclusion for individuals with MS in the work environment. However, disclosure remains a complex decision influenced by stigma and workplace culture. Psychological safety and proactive organisational sensemaking significantly impact employees' experiences. Conclusion: For meaningful workplace inclusion, organisations must move beyond compliance-driven policies and foster an environment where employees with MS feel valued and supported. Contribution: By integrating reflexivity, sensemaking theory and the Social Model of Disability, this study offers valuable contributions to the discourse on disability inclusion.

Indexed as

disability inclusionmultiple sclerosisreflexivitysensemakingsocial modelSouth Africa

Identifiers

PMID41070038
PMCPMC12505428

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.