Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41070023›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in nutrition2025

Integrative natural health solutions for midlife women.

Vanita Dahia, Will Shannon, Anastasia Suraev, Sandra Villella, Gerald Münch, Diana Chan-Lau, David J Hunter

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in nutrition, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Vanita DahiaEmpowered Health, Blackburn, VIC, Australia.
Will ShannonPinnacle Health, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Anastasia SuraevHealthy Brain Ageing Program, Brain and Mind Centre, School of Psychology, Faculty of Science, University of Sydney, Camperdown, NSW, Australia.
Sandra VillellaJean Hailes for Women's Health, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Gerald MünchPharmacology Unit, School of Medicine, Western Sydney University, Campbelltown, NSW, Australia.
Diana Chan-LauMedical Affairs, Haleon Pty Ltd, Parramatta, NSW, Australia.
David J HunterSydney Musculoskeletal Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Global interest in natural health products (NHPs) as complementary or alternative treatments is growing, especially among midlife women, due to their diverse health needs. Despite increased NHP use and benefits suggested by traditional use, the available scientific evidence supporting NHP efficacy and safety is often inconsistent, leading to hesitancy among health professionals about their use, even when reasonable evidence exists. Here, we offer a multidisciplinary perspective on optimizing NHP use alongside conventional clinical management in midlife women's health. We advocate for robust systematic frameworks to generate and evaluate evidence from well-designed clinical studies, employing methodologies like those used for conventional medicines, but adapted to address the unique complexities of NHPs. We highlight key considerations for designing and developing NHP formulations: understanding differences in the activity spectrum of distinct extracts, the bioavailability of active compounds, and the chemical forms of the products. We also emphasize the importance of effectively communicating evidence on NHPs and its implications to health professionals and consumers, so as to maximize therapeutic benefits and minimize potential health risks. Essential actions include incorporating NHP education into continuing education programs for health professionals and enhancing public health literacy to promote safe, responsible, and informed use among consumers. Evidence-based approaches and multidisciplinary collaborations will help drive these essential actions and accelerate the complementary use of NHPs in improving health outcomes.

Indexed as

complementary medicineevidence-based medicinehealthmiddle-agedwomen

Identifiers

PMID41070023
PMCPMC12505666

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.