ArticleSchizophrenia bulletin open2025
"A Connected Community": Evaluating the Use of Project ECHO to Support the Implementation of an Evidence-Based Early Psychosis Care Model.
Article in Schizophrenia bulletin open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
21 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and Hypothesis: The Methods: Using Moore's Evaluation Framework for Continuing Education, attendance and biweekly surveys were used to evaluate clinician engagement and satisfaction with ECHO. A self-reported survey was used to assess self-efficacy across core competencies, determine whether ECHO changed their practice, and describe the nature of any changes. Semi-structured interviews focusing on participants' experience with ECHO EPI-SET were analyzed using thematic analysis. Results: A total of 92 participants from 6 EPI sites participated across 3 cycles of ECHO EPI-SET. Mean satisfaction ratings were high (>4/5 on a Likert scale). Participants who worked longer at their sites reported higher rates of self-efficacy. The interviews identified 5 major themes: creating a community of practice; supporting NAVIGATE; change in practice/application; implementation support; and strengths and areas for improvement. Conclusions: This is the first published evaluation of using ECHO in supporting the implementation of a model of EPI care. Participation in ECHO was associated with high levels of clinician satisfaction, engagement, and self-efficacy. Qualitative data suggest that ECHO supported the development of a community of practice, learning, and practice change and may be a helpful tool to support future implementations of NAVIGATE.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.