ArticleBMJ public health2025
Do perceptions of the harm of heated tobacco products differ by smoking status? A cross-sectional analysis of the Japan Society and New Tobacco Internet Survey (JASTIS) 2020 in Japan.
Article in BMJ public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Nationwide trends in cigarette, heated tobacco product, e-cigarette, and multiple-product use in Japan 2017-2025.PCN reports : psychiatry and clinical neurosciences · 2026Article
- Tobacco Smoke Exposure and Oxidative Stress: The Role of Circulating Lipopolysaccharides in Heated and Conventional Products.Antioxidants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Most studies have examined 'perceived harm of heated tobacco products (HTPs)' relative to combustible cigarettes (CCs). However, there is a lack of understanding regarding whether the public perceives HTPs as harmful in an absolute sense and whether this perception varies according to smoking status. Therefore, we examined the perceived absolute harm of HTPs (not relative to CCs) across different smoking statuses. Methods: We surveyed 8229 respondents (3292 females) online in Japan in 2020. Analyses were stratified by sex because of corresponding differences in smoking rates in Japan. Logistic regression was performed to calculate the ORs, adjusted for potential confounders, including age and education, of agreeing with the statements ' Results: Current male smokers, particularly HTP users, were more likely to agree with ' Conclusions: Regardless of sexes, current smokers, particularly HTP users, tended to perceive HTP to do little harm to themselves and no harm to others in an absolute sense than current non-smokers. Providing accurate and up-to-date health information regarding HTP is crucial in minimising potential health risks to both smokers and non-smokers.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.