SynthesisFrontiers in artificial intelligence2025
Deep learning in ultrasound tongue imaging: a systematic review toward automated detection of speech sound disorders.
Synthesis in Frontiers in artificial intelligence, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Ultrasound Tongue Imaging in Research and Practice with People with Cleft Palate ± Cleft Lip.The Cleft palate-craniofacial journal : official publication of the American Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Association · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Speech sound disorders (SSD) in children can significantly impact communication and development. Ultrasound tongue imaging (UTI) is a non-invasive method for visualising tongue motion during speech, offering a promising alternative for diagnosis and therapy. Deep learning (DL) techniques have shown great promise in automating the analysis of UTI data, although their clinical application for SSD remains underexplored. Objective: This review aims to synthesise how DL has been utilised in UTI to support automated SSD detection, highlighting the advancement of techniques, key challenges, and future directions. Methods: A comprehensive search of IEEE Xplore, PubMed, ScienceDirect, Scopus, Taylor & Francis, and arXiv identified studies from 2010 through 2025. Inclusion criteria focused on studies using DL to analyse UTI data with relevance to SSD classification, feature extraction, or speech assessment. Eleven studies met the criteria: three directly tackled disordered speech classification tasks, while four addressed supporting tasks like tongue contour segmentation and tongue motion modelling. Promising results were reported in each category, but limitations such as small datasets, inconsistent evaluation, and limited generalisability were common. Results: DL models demonstrate effectiveness in analysing UTI for articulatory assessment and show early potential in identifying SSD-related patterns. The included studies collectively outline a developmental pipeline, from foundational pre-processing to phoneme-level classification in typically developing speakers, and finally to preliminary attempts at classifying speech errors in children with SSD. This progression illustrates significant technological advances; however, it also emphasises gaps such as the lack of large, disorder-focused datasets and the need for integrated end-to-end systems. Conclusion: The field of DL-driven UTI assessment for speech disorders is developing. Current studies provide a strong technical foundation and proof-of-concept for automatic SSD detection using ultrasound, but clinical translation remains limited. Future research should prioritise the creation of larger annotated UTI datasets of disordered speech, developing generalisable and interpretable models, and validating fully integrated DL-UTI pipelines in real-world speech therapy settings. With these advances, DL-based UTI systems have the potential to transform SSD diagnosis and treatment by providing objective, real-time articulatory feedback in a child-friendly manner.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.