ArticleCureus2025
Gender and Racial Disparities in Diagnostic Radiology Residency Programs: A Decade of Trends and Implications for Diversity and Inclusion.
Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Evaluating AI-powered instruction on Computed Tomography Angiography (CTA) teaching outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis.BMC medical education · 2026Pooled it
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
As the United States moves toward becoming a minority-majority nation by 2060, achieving diversity within the physician workforce has become increasingly important. Diagnostic Radiology, however, continues to demonstrate persistent disparities in representation, particularly among racial, ethnic, and gender minorities. This study examined gender, racial, and ethnic representation among Diagnostic Radiology residents from 2013 to 2023 using data from the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education Data Resource Book. Residents self-reported their race and ethnicity into defined categories. Data trends were analyzed over the decade to assess shifts in representation. Of 46,557 Diagnostic Radiology residents, 33,871 (72.8%) were male and 12,431 (26.7%) were female. Racial and ethnic breakdowns included 24,482 (52.6%) White, 10,297 (22.1%) Asian, 2,126 (4.57%) Hispanic/Latino, 1,561 (3.35%) Black/African American, 83 (0.18%) American Indian/Alaskan Native, 10 (0.021%) Native Hawaiian/Pacific Islander, 615 (1.32%) multiracial, 2,246 (4.82%) other, and 5,137 (11%) unknown. Overall, 47.4% of residents identified as non-White. Despite increasing attention to diversity and inclusion, Diagnostic Radiology remains one of the least diverse medical specialties. Contributing factors include limited exposure to radiology during medical school, lack of mentorship, and structural barriers in the residency selection process. Targeted efforts such as diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) committees, pipeline programs, and holistic applicant reviews have emerged as key strategies to promote diversity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.