ArticleCureus2025
Anesthesia Practice Shift Scheduling With a Generative Deep Learning Model.
Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Anesthesiology scheduling techniques are inadequate to appropriately deal with modern anesthesia practice demands. Anesthesiologists are increasingly dissatisfied with their jobs in the face of inflexible schedules, increasing workload, and the complexity of practice. Decreasing autonomy and inherent responsibility lead to burnout and decreased job satisfaction. Unfortunately, equitable and timely shift scheduling that meets individual provider expectations remains a distant mirage. Technology has been promised as a means to decrease workload and improve productivity. But technology has not met these expectations. In real-world anesthesia practice, scheduling remains contentious and time-consuming. These failures are somewhat attributable to current scheduling systems and software. In this paper, we present an alternative method of anesthesiology shift scheduling using advances in machine learning (ML). The development of this deep learning (DL) model for shift scheduling drastically reduces the effort required to create shift schedules that comply with the rules and regulations observed by anesthesia practices. A DL model architecture is developed, trained with shift schedule data from the Reno-Tahoe Anesthesia (RTA) group, and evaluated against the practice requirements. The DL model trained and evaluated demonstrates a Matthews Correlation Coefficient (MCC) of 0.9776 and balanced accuracy of 0.9531. The trained model reliably learns practice scheduling rules sufficient to generate new shift schedules in compliance with the rules. Furthermore, the trained model learns practice rules solely from past examples without requiring a human expert to codify the rules.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.