ArticleJournal of otology2025
Quantification of vestibular perception during caloric test.
Article in Journal of otology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Adaptive rehabilitation training for vestibular semicircular canal injury based on virtual reality technology.Journal of otology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: It has been reported that factors such as age and vestibular pathology (i.e. vestibular migraine) could impact self-motion perception during vestibular stimulation. However, to our knowledge, no objective test has been developed to quantify self-motion perception during clinical vestibular evaluation. Objective: The main objective of the present study was to quantify vestibular perception during caloric vestibular stimulation using a tachometer. Methods: Twenty-two participants were divided into three groups: 1) younger healthy adults, 2) older healthy adults and 3) vestibular impaired adults. All participants performed bithermal water caloric irrigation during which slow-phase eye velocity (SPV) was measured using videonystagmography and self-motion velocity perception was assessed using a handheld tachometer (RPM). Results: The results revealed a significant difference in SPV between vestibular impaired ears and both healthy groups, and a significant difference in self-motion velocity perception between healthy young and vestibular impaired participants. Conclusions: This study suggest that the SPV similarly to self-motion perception (RPM) can differentiate between vestibular impaired and young healthy participants. Future work is required to assess the influence of self-motion perception in aging.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.