Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41069837›Full record

ArticleJournal of otology2025

Developing a novel assistive technology, empowering the deaf to speak, using visual feedback.

Singh S, Nagarajan K, Chachan R, Pandey P, Vijayalakshmi P, Verma N, Singh A

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of otology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Singh SAmrita Institute of Medical Sciences and Research Centre Mata Amritanandamayi Marg, Sector 88 Faridabad, Haryana 121002, INDIA.
Nagarajan KCouth IT, Hyderabad, India.
Chachan R4S Medical Research P Ltd, New Delhi, India.
Pandey P4S Medical Research P Ltd, New Delhi, India.
Vijayalakshmi PSSN College of Engineering, Chennai, India.
Verma NManipal University College Malaysia, Melaka, Malaysia.
Singh AHenrico, Parham & Retreat Hospitals, Richmond, Virginia, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundProfoundly deaf children beyond 5 years of age and deaf adults with no prior access to hearing have limited options to learn oral speech. They rely mainly on sign language for communication. This is because, in the absence of hearing, the brain of a deaf person is not able to process any feedback of its own speech efforts.

methodWe have developed a novel assistive technology that provides visual feedback of speech efforts to the brain of a deaf person learning to speak on a smart phone or computer, in the absence of auditory feedback. We propose that a deaf person with compensatory heightened visual processing skills, should be able to use this visual feedback to develop speech.

resultsThe first prototype of our novel assistive technology was used on 72 deaf persons (children and adults) attending deaf schools in Delhi. They progressed from speaking no sounds to about 18 sounds in 6 months.

conclusionAssistive technology using sensory substitution is a promising new approach to help deaf children and adults develop oral speech using visual feedback. More research needs to be carried out in developing this technology further.

Indexed as

cochlear implantsdeafnessdeaf rehabilitationdeaf speechsign languagespeech to text

Identifiers

PMID41069837
PMCPMC12510346

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.