ArticleFrontiers in public health2025
Internal and external silica dust exposure threshold as an early screening index for silicosis: a cross-sectional study.
Article in Frontiers in public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Common occupational hazards such as lead, chromium, and mercury have clear biological detection thresholds, but silicon dioxide does not. Therefore, this study aims to determine silica dust exposure thresholds internal and external exposure to identify early screening markers and help screening for susceptible individuals and prevent silicosis. Methods: Basic information, including physical examination data and questionnaires, was collected from the study participants. Blood and urine samples from iron mine workers were also collected as biological specimens. Silicon levels in these samples were measured using ICP-MS, and cumulative dust exposure was calculated based on an on-site hygiene investigation of the mine. Results: Overall, 1,964 participants were included in the study: 1,823 in the dust exposure group (without illness) and 141 in the silicosis group (with illness). Analysis revealed that the silicosis group had higher cumulative dust exposure, indicating an elevated external exposure index. Internal exposure indicators, such as elevated blood and urine silicon levels, were identified as risk factors for silicosis. Screening thresholds were determined using receiver operating characteristic curves and restricted cubic splines. The results showed that workers had an average dust exposure duration of 8.5 years. The threshold values were 8.02 μg/L for blood silicon with an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.557, 9.51 μg/L for urine silicon with AUC of 0.647, and 3728.50 mg·years for cumulative dust exposure with AUC of 0.658. When validated with external data from silica-exposed workers, blood silicon had the highest accuracy as an early screening indicator for silicosis. Conclusion: Blood silicon, urine silicon, and cumulative dust exposure were initially proposed as early screening indicators for silicosis. Validation with external worker data showed that blood silicon had relatively high threshol reliability as a screening marker.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.