Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41069817›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in public health2025

Why did people refuse vaccination during the pandemic? Exploring the impacts of trust and vaccine risk perception on COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy in China.

Dan Huang, Yi Wu, Hui Li

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Dan HuangDepartment of Media and Communication, City University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China.
Yi WuSchool of Media and Communication, Shenzhen University, Shenzhen, China.
Hui LiSchool of Media and Communication, Shenzhen University, Shenzhen, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Vaccination was a critical step in combating the COVID-19 outbreak, but vaccine hesitancy was a prominent global concern in the pandemic. In China, the behavior of vaccination might be affected by the past vaccine-related scandals. Objective: This study investigated the factors contributing to vaccine hesitancy in China, with a focus on trust, vaccine risk perception, and self-efficacy. It aims to explore the predictors and mechanisms that influence vaccine hesitancy in China during the pandemic. Method: The study utilized a national survey fielded in 2021, with a representative sample of 3,000 Chinese adults. Quota sampling was employed to ensure regional and demographic representation of the sample. Key variables including institutional, media, and scientific trust, vaccine risk perception, and self-efficacy were measured adopting established scales from previous studies. A mediated moderation model was proposed. Trusts were hypothesized to affect vaccine hesitancy through vaccine risk perception. Moderation effect of self-efficacy on the relationship between vaccine risk perception and vaccine hesitancy was also proposed. Mediated moderation regressions were performed for model estimation. Results: Our analyses show that institutional trust was negatively associated with vaccine hesitancy [ Conclusion: The findings revealed that trust in institutions significantly reduced vaccine hesitancy by lowering perceived risks. In contrast, media and scientific trust heightened vaccine risk perception and hesitancy. Additionally, the study demonstrated the role of self-efficacy in moderating these effects.

Indexed as

COVID-19COVID-19 VaccinesTrustVaccinationVaccination HesitancyAdolescentAdultAgedChinaFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPandemicsSARS-CoV-2Self EfficacyCOVID-19 VaccinesChinaCOVID-19risk perceptionself-efficacytrustvaccine hesitancy

Identifiers

PMID41069817
PMCPMC12504182

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.