Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41069794›Full record

ArticleJournal of pregnancy2025

Exploration of Nakivale Refugees' and Stakeholders' Perceptions and Priorities of Male Engagement in Pregnancy, Childbirth, Postpartum, and Family Planning: A Qualitative Study.

HaEun Lee, Donath Asiimire, Johnson Atwiine, Betrum Namanya, Richard Nsengiyumva, Lynae Darbes, Fred Sheldon Mwesigwa

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of pregnancy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

HaEun LeeDepartment of Systems, Populations, and Leadership, University of Michigan School of Nursing, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1259-6425
Donath AsiimireDepartment of Economics, Statistics, and Tourism Management, Bishop Stuart University, Mbarara, Uganda.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5743-4825
Johnson AtwiineDepartment of Business, Economics and Governance, Bishop Stuart University, Mbarara, Uganda.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2312-2468
Betrum NamanyaDepartment of Economics, Statistics, and Tourism Management, Bishop Stuart University, Mbarara, Uganda.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0009-1698-3631
Richard NsengiyumvaSchool of Nursing and Midwifery, University of Rwanda, Kigali, Rwanda.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0006-3787-1418
Lynae DarbesDepartment of Health Behavior and Biological Sciences, University of Michigan School of Nursing, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4738-6812
Fred Sheldon MwesigwaDepartment of Humanities, Bishop Stuart University, Mbarara, Uganda.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0009-0157-9484

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: African refugee communities in Uganda encounter significant barriers to maternal health services, particularly regarding men's involvement in maternal health. This study explored the perspectives of African refugees and stakeholders on men's engagement in couple's maternal health decisions, utilizing an interdependence-based theoretical model as a framework. Methods: This qualitative study, conducted in Uganda's Nakivale refugee settlement, included 14 in-depth interviews with healthcare providers, community leaders, and religious leaders, along with eight focus group discussions ( Results: Key individual-level factors influencing engagement included men's financial status, mental health, and peer/community influence. At the couple level, closeness, trust, commitment, communication, and joint household decision-making were crucial for fostering male participation. Couples with a high transformation of motivation viewed maternal health as a shared concern rather than an individual one. Those practicing effective communal coping, discussing and jointly deciding to address maternal health issues, also expressed higher engagement in health-promoting behaviors, such as saving for birth, attending antenatal visits together, utilizing family planning, and sharing household chores. Conclusions: Maternal health should be reframed as a shared responsibility between partners, not solely women's issue. To effectively engage African refugee couples and improve outcomes, interventions must prioritize men's involvement alongside women-focused efforts, eventually addressing couples together. These initiatives should enhance men's financial literacy, mental health, knowledge, and relationship quality to foster equitable discussions, decisions, and behaviors between refugee couples.

Indexed as

Family Planning ServicesParturitionRefugeesAdultDecision MakingFemaleFocus GroupsHumansMalePostpartum PeriodPregnancyQualitative ResearchStakeholder ParticipationUgandaYoung Adultmaternal healthmen's engagementmen's involvementrefugee healthreproductive health

Identifiers

PMID41069794
PMCPMC12507498

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.