Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41069698›Full record

ArticleJournal of otology2025

Psychosocial and Audiological Characteristics in Misophonia: An Interdisciplinary Comparison Study of Adults with Misophonia to Healthy Controls.

Mercedes G Woolley, Hailey E Johnson, Emily M Bowers, Doris Velasquez, Julie M Petersen, Karen Muñoz, Michael P Twohig

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of otology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Mercedes G WoolleyDepartment of Psychology, Utah State University.
Hailey E JohnsonDepartment of Psychology, Utah State University.
Emily M BowersDepartment of Psychology, Utah State University.
Doris VelasquezDepartment of Communicative Disorders and Deaf Education, Utah State University Financial disclosures/conflicts of interest: This project was funded by a grant from the Misophonia Research Fund and soQuiet Foundation. Authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.
Julie M PetersenDepartment of Psychology, Utah State University.
Karen MuñozDepartment of Communicative Disorders and Deaf Education, Utah State University Financial disclosures/conflicts of interest: This project was funded by a grant from the Misophonia Research Fund and soQuiet Foundation. Authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.
Michael P TwohigDepartment of Psychology, Utah State University.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite the increasing investigation into misophonia, its classification remains debated due to symptom overlap with audiological and psychological conditions, as well as methodological limitations in existing studies. In the present study, we compared a clinical sample of adults seeking treatment for misophonia with a non-treatment-seeking sample of age- and gender-matched healthy controls. In these two samples, we examined the psychological and audiological features of misophonia by assessing key psychological processes (anger, disgust, OCD symptoms, anxiety, depression, stress, well-being, and psychological inflexibility) and audiological features (hearing, hyperacusis, and tinnitus). We found that individuals with misophonia exhibit higher levels of psychological inflexibility and stress compared to healthy controls. Audiological comparisons indicated that hyperacusis is more prevalent in the misophonia group, with significantly more impairment in social and occupational functioning. There were no differences between groups on an objective assessment of hearing, although self-report measures indicated that individuals with misophonia may have greater difficulty with auditory processing. These findings suggest that misophonia is a complex disorder marked by transdiagnostic psychological characteristics and sound sensitivities. Our results underscore the need for interdisciplinary assessment and treatment approaches that incorporate psychosocial and audiological perspectives.

Indexed as

AudiologyHyperacusisMisophoniaPsychological InflexibilityTransdiagnostic processes

Identifiers

PMID41069698
PMCPMC12510352

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.