ArticleESMO gastrointestinal oncology2025
Development and characterization of orthotopic patient-derived xenograft models of peritoneal metastatic mucinous appendiceal adenocarcinoma.
Article in ESMO gastrointestinal oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- KRAS inhibition is an effective therapy for appendiceal adenocarcinoma.Journal of hematology & oncology · 2026Article
- An appendiceal cancer organoid biobank identifies phenotypic evolution and druggable dependencies of peritoneal carcinomatosis.Developmental cell · 2026Article
- KRAS inhibition is an effective therapy for appendiceal adenocarcinoma.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Synchronous gastric and appendiceal mucinous adenocarcinomas: a rare case report.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
19 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Background: Appendiceal adenocarcinomas (AAs) are a rare and heterogeneous group of tumors for which few preclinical models exist. The lack of preclinical models of AA has hindered drug development and is a major factor in why AA remains without a single FDA-approved systemic treatment. Materials and Methods: Tumors from 16 patients with appendiceal neoplasms (15 AA and one HAMN) were implanted into flank and peritoneal cavity of immunodeficient mice leading to the successful establishment of 3 AAPDX models. Histological, immunohistochemical, genetic, and transcriptomic comparison of patient and PDX tumors were performed. Results: Higher tumor grade, peritoneal implantation, and RAS/RAF mutation were associated with successful tumor engraftment. Comparison of histological, immunohistochemical and molecular analyses including both RNA and DNA sequencing revealed that the PDX models recreate many of the features of metastatic AA, but also displayed several differences between paired PDX and human tumors highlighting the intra-tumoral heterogeneity of AA within each patient. Notably tumor from two patients with primarily low-grade mucinous adenocarcinoma converted to high-grade histology in PDX. Transcriptomic comparison of patient and PDX tumors identified increased Myc and E2F signaling, suggesting that activation of Myc may be a driver of de-differentiation in AA. The established PDX were able to undergo serial passaging and expansion and exhibited stable histological features during this process, allowing for drug testing. Conclusions: These molecularly profiled, orthotopic PDX models of metastatic AA represent a unique resource for future exploration to identify novel therapies for this orphan disease.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.