ArticleDepression and anxiety2025
Interrelationships Among Personality Traits, Depressive Symptoms, Childhood Abuse, and Social Disability.
Article in Depression and anxiety, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Personality traits and childhood abuse were found to be associated with depressive symptoms and with each other. However, no previous study has elucidated the directional interrelationship among those factors in a clinical population of patients with major depressive disorder (MDD). This study sought to construct networks to explicate the directional interrelationship among those factors and social disability, identify the most central factor, and explore potentially existing causality chains implied by the directed association chains. Methods: This cross-sectional study analyzed data from 1445 patients with MDD in a national cohort. Personality traits were measured using the Eysenck Personality Questionnaire-Revised Short Scale for Chinese (EPQ-RSC). Seven dimensions of depressive symptoms were measured with various scales: depression, anxiety, insomnia, and somatic symptoms with the 17-item Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAMD-17), the loss of pleasure sensation with the Snaith-Hamilton Pleasure Scale (SHAPS), apathy with the Modified Apathy Evaluation Scale (MAES), and fatigue with the Chalder Fatigue Scale (CFS-11). Childhood abuse experience was measured using the Childhood Trauma Questionnaire-Short Form (CTQ-SF). Social disability was measured with the Sheehan Disability Scale (SDS). Undirected and Bayesian network analyses were used to identify central factors and explore directional interrelationships among the variables. Results: The loss of pleasure sensation was the most central in terms of strength and closeness. In the directed acyclic graph (DAG) derived from the Bayesian network analysis, psychoticism was positioned at the highest level in the model, suggesting its causal precedence. One key directed association chain, which implied a potentially existing causality chain, was that psychoticism predicted the loss of pleasure sensation, and this symptom predicted social disability. Conclusion: Loss of pleasure sensation and psychoticism might be important for future research in MDD. The appearance of psychoticism at the beginning of the directed association chain (which implied a potentially existing causality chain) involving the central factor and the characteristics of high psychoticism implied that the social/interpersonal component of the loss of pleasure sensation may be a meaningful focus of future research and intervention of MDD. Trial Registration: Chinese Clinical Trial Registry: ChiCTR2200059053.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.