ArticleTransplantation direct2025
Association Between Donor-recipient Matchability, Access to Transplantation, and Posttransplant Outcomes.
Article in Transplantation direct, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Highly sensitized kidney transplant candidates: integrating acceptable mismatch, desensitization, imlifidase, and emerging immune-cell targeting strategies.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
- Erratum: Association Between Donor-recipient Matchability, Access to Transplantation, and Posttransplant Outcomes: Erratum.Transplantation direct · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Globally, deceased donor kidney allocation algorithms prioritize HLA matching, potentially disadvantaging transplant candidates with less common HLA alleles. This study developed an Australian Matchability score (M-score) to assess access to transplantation and posttransplant outcomes based on HLA match probability. Methods: M-scores were calculated by comparing all recipients and donors with complete HLA-A, HLA-B, and HLA-DR data from the Australia and New Zealand Dialysis and Transplant Registry (July 1, 2006-December 31, 2023). Multivariable Cox regression was used to analyze associations between M-score quartiles and time to transplantation as well as transplantation outcomes. Results: HLA data from 14 836 recipients and 7708 donors were used to generate M-scores. Of these, 10 760 recipients had available waitlist data and were included in the models. M-scores were normally distributed with a mean ± SD of 11.4 ± 0.9. The proportion of non-European Australians increased significantly with each quartile (ie, more difficult to HLA match), Q1: 16%, Q2: 26%, Q3: 40% Q4: 60% ( Conclusions: The M-score identifies transplant recipients with difficult-to-match HLA profiles. Higher M-scores were associated with a lower likelihood of transplantation and an increased risk of death-censored graft loss and acute rejection. These findings highlight significant inequities in the current HLA-based algorithm for deceased donor allocation.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.