ArticleJournal of oral and maxillofacial pathology : JOMFP
Forensic DNA analysis of heat-exposed unrestored teeth: Temperature and duration effects.
Article in Journal of oral and maxillofacial pathology : JOMFP. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Comparative study of STR, SNP, and mtDNA recovery in teeth after thermal exposure.International journal of legal medicine · 2026Article
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Context: Forensic identification often relies on DNA recovery from human remains, with teeth being a preferred source due to their resistance to extreme conditions. Aim: To evaluate the DNA yield from unrestored teeth exposed to various temperatures and durations and assess its utility in forensic identification. Settings and Design: An experimental study assessing DNA recovery from teeth subjected to controlled heat exposure. Materials and Methods: Unrestored teeth were exposed to temperatures of 200°C, 450°C, 700°C, 950°C, and 1200°C for 30 and 60 min. DNA was then extracted and quantified. Statistical Analysis Used: The study analysed DNA yield from unrestored teeth exposed to varying temperatures and durations. Posterior teeth showed higher yields, with DNA decreasing as heat and time increased. Independent Results: DNA was effectively recovered at lower temperatures and shorter durations. Higher temperatures and longer exposures reduced DNA yield, highlighting the relevance of thermal conditions in forensic applications. Conclusions: Forensic dentistry is crucial in identifying remains exposed to fire or decomposition. Teeth, especially posteriors, often preserve DNA due to their durability and protected position. They offer a reliable, cost-effective source of genetic material, even in harsh conditions. Advancements in extraction methods continue to improve identification in complex forensic cases.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.