ArticleVeterinary oncology (London, England)2025
Comparison of interpatient and intrapatient variability in doxorubicin exposure using a validated limited sampling model in dogs with cancer.
Article in Veterinary oncology (London, England), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Background: Doxorubicin (DOX) is an anthracycline chemotherapeutic used for many canine malignancies, and its adverse event (AE) profile has been well-described in dogs. A limited sampling (LS) pharmacokinetic model was recently developed in canine patients to predict hematologic exposure to DOX. The primary goal of this study was to evaluate within-patient and between-patient variability in DOX exposure over three consecutive doses using the LS model. A secondary goal was to determine if there is a correlation between DOX exposure and gastrointestinal (GI) AEs utilizing a standardized owner questionnaire. Methods: We performed a prospective evaluation of DOX exposure in seven tumor-bearing dogs across three cycles of treatment and compared the coefficient of variation (%CV) of the between- and within-patient exposures. Results: This data set corroborated the ability of the DOX LS model to predict absolute neutrophil count for patients whose absolute neutrophil counts are lower at seven days compared to baseline. Dose normalized within-patient variability (4.7%) was significantly lower ( Conclusions: Together, these data suggest wide interpatient variability in dose-normalized DOX exposure but much more consistent exposure within an individual patient across treatment cycles. Future studies can attempt to target specific DOX exposures and absolute neutrophil counts to assess if DOX dosing can be personalized to increase efficacy and decrease GI AEs. Supplementary Information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s44356-025-00038-z.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.