Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41069555›Full record

ArticleHealth SA = SA Gesondheid2025

Wellness profile of residents in urban retirement villages in the City of Johannesburg.

Lynn Smith, Simone Ferreira, Thembisile Mbatha

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health SA = SA Gesondheid, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Lynn SmithDepartment of Sport and Movement Studies, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Johannesburg, Johannesburg, South Africa.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8562-5004
Simone FerreiraDepartment of Sport and Movement Studies, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Johannesburg, Johannesburg, South Africa.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1446-3458
Thembisile MbathaDepartment of Sport and Movement Studies, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Johannesburg, Johannesburg, South Africa.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2067-0656

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Retirement is a significant life transition that often brings changes in daily routines, including health screening and levels of physical activity. Aim: The aim of this study was to determine the wellness profile of residents living in retirement villages. Setting: This study was conducted in the City of Johannesburg. Methods: This cross-sectional, descriptive and quantitative study included 108 retirees from 7 retirement villages. To determine the wellness profile, biokinetic wellness screening tests were performed, including blood pressure, heart rate, rate pressure product, height, weight, body mass index (BMI), handgrip strength, sit-and-reach test and Apley's back scratch test. Results: The median age of the sample was 75 years. Significant variability was noted in the BMI measurement (25.35 kg/m Conclusion: Strength was greater among male participants, while better flexibility but higher heart rates were recorded among females. Tailored interventions emphasising cardiovascular health, weight management and physical performance are recommended among retirees. Contribution: This resource will guide policymakers, community managers and healthcare professionals in designing targeted interventions and inform future research on ageing and wellness in urban settings.

Indexed as

biokineticscommunity healthelderly health statusgood health and wellbeinghealthcarephysical wellbeingretiree health trends

Identifiers

PMID41069555
PMCPMC12505391

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.