Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41069554›Full record

ArticleHealth SA = SA Gesondheid2025

Perspectives of primary healthcare nurses on cultural practices contributing to late antenatal booking in South Africa.

Sharon H Maluleke-Ngomane, Thifhelimbilu I Ramavhoya

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health SA = SA Gesondheid, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Sharon H Maluleke-NgomaneDepartment of Nursing, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Johannesburg, Johannesburg, South Africa.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8421-5057
Thifhelimbilu I RamavhoyaDepartment of Nursing, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Limpopo, Polokwane, South Africa.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5065-9119

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Primary health care (PHC) nurses are crucial in reducing late antenatal booking and early detection of pregnancy-related conditions to enhance the best perinatal outcomes. Research confirms that early antenatal care is a key intervention to safe motherhood, aimed at preventing perinatal adverse events; however, cultural practices of pregnant women have a role to play in late antenatal booking. Aim: This study explored and discussed the cultural practices of antenatal clients that contribute to late antenatal booking as related by PHC nurses. Setting: This study was conducted at PHC facilities in Mpumalanga province, South Africa. Methods: Following qualitative phenomenological design, PHC nurses' perceptions of cultural practices of antenatal clients contributing to delayed antenatal booking were explored and described. Purposeful sampling was followed to sample PHC nurses with three or more years of experience to respond to in-depth, open-ended questions. Colaizzi's thematic data analysis was used to facilitate emerging themes and sub-themes. Measures of trustworthiness were ensured for this study. Results: Results show that PHC nurses believe that antenatal clients intentionally book late and use herbs and religious interventions. Furthermore, PHC nurses neglect the cultural practices of antenatal clients. Conclusion: Primary health care nurses may encourage trusting relationships by making cultural adjustments and increasing cultural competency, which may increase early antenatal booking, reduce the use of harmful interventions and improve positive perinatal outcomes. Contributions: This study contributed to an awareness of cultural inertia among PHC nurses, which may be averting clients from openness to health promotion provided at PHC facilities.

Indexed as

cultural competencycultural inertiacultural practiceslate antenatal bookingpregnancyreligious beliefreligious interventionstraditional health practitioners

Identifiers

PMID41069554
PMCPMC12505420

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.