Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41069505›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in robotics and AI2025

Optimizing hip exoskeleton assistance pattern based on machine learning and simulation algorithms: a personalized approach to metabolic cost reduction.

Arash Mohammadzadeh Gonabadi, Iraklis I Pipinos, Sara A Myers, Farahnaz Fallahtafti

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in robotics and AI, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Arash Mohammadzadeh GonabadiInstitute for Rehabilitation Science and Engineering, Madonna Rehabilitation Hospitals, Omaha, NE, United States.
Iraklis I PipinosDepartment of Surgery, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE, United States.
Sara A MyersDepartment of Biomechanics, University of Nebraska at Omaha, Omaha, NE, United States.
Farahnaz FallahtaftiDepartment of Biomechanics, University of Nebraska at Omaha, Omaha, NE, United States.

Funding

Visual control of locomotion in people with Parkinsons diseaseP20GM109090 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA OMAHA · PI STERGIOU, NIKOLAOS · 2014 to 2023
$20.5M
Effect of cell-based therapies on functional, hemodynamic, and histologic outcomes in a porcine model of peripheral arterial diseaseR01AG062198 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA MEDICAL CENTER · PI CARLSON, MARK A, PIPINOS, IRAKLIS ILIAS · 2019 to 2023
$3.1M
MitoQ treatment of claudication: myofiber and micro-vessel pathologyR01AG077803 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA MEDICAL CENTER · PI Iraklis Ilias Pipinos · 2022 to 2026
$3.0M
Improving mobility in peripheral artery disease using an ankle foot orthosisR01HD090333 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA OMAHA · PI MYERS, SARA A · 2016 to 2020
$2.1M
NIA NIH HHS R01 AG062198NIA NIH HHS R01 AG077803NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD090333NIGMS NIH HHS P20 GM109090RRD VA I01 RX000604RRD VA I01 RX003266
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Hip exoskeletons can lower the metabolic cost of walking in many tasks and populations, but their assistance patterns must be tailored to each user. We developed a simulation-based, human-in-the-loop (HIL) optimization framework combining machine learning (ML) and global optimization to personalize hip exoskeleton assistance patterns. Methods: Using data from ten healthy adults, we trained a Gradient Boosting (GB) surrogate model to predict normalized metabolic cost as a function of Peak Magnitude and End Timing of assistive torque. GB achieved the lowest relative absolute error percentage (RAEP) of 0.66%, outperforming Random Forest (RAEP = 0.83%) and Support Vector Regression (RAEP = 0.98%) among nine ML models. We then evaluated seven optimization algorithms, including Covariance Matrix Adaptation Evolution Strategy, Bayesian Optimization, Exploitative Bayesian Optimization, Cross-Entropy, Genetic Algorithm, Gravitational Search Algorithm (GSA), and Particle Swarm Optimization (PSO), to identify optimal assistance profiles. Results: GSA predicted the lowest metabolic cost (-1.06), equivalent to an estimated 53% reduction relative to no exoskeleton assistance, while PSO showed the highest efficiency (AUC = 0.24). Discussion: These simulated predictions, though not empirical measurements, demonstrate the framework's ability to streamline algorithm selection, reduce experimental burden, and accelerate translation of exoskeleton optimization into rehabilitation, occupational, and performance enhancement applications with broader biomechanical and clinical impact.

Indexed as

biomechanicsgait optimizationhip exoskeletonhuman-in-the-loop optimizationmachine learningmetabolic costpersonalized wearable robotic controlsurrogate modeling

Identifiers

PMID41069505
PMCPMC12504096

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.