ArticleJournal of otology2025
Improvement in self-perceived hearing and quality of life is associated with the time elapsed since cochlear implantation in adults with post-lingual hearing loss.
Article in Journal of otology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: The study aimed to investigate the otology-specific and general health-related quality of life (HRQoL) after cochlear implantation, and scrutinize the variables associated with them. Methods: The Ear Outcome Survey-16 (EOS-16), which assesses ear-specific symptoms and quality of life (QoL), was administered before and after cochlear implantation along with the post-operative administration of the 15D questionnaire that evaluates general HRQoL. The authors investigated post-implantation changes in the EOS-16 total scores and its category responses, examining their relationship with pre- and post-operative hearing levels, speech perception in noise, and the follow-up period length (time elapsed since cochlear implantation). Results: There were positive changes noted for the hearing, need for care, and QoL categories of the EOS-16 after implantation. The length of the follow-up period was a significant factor associated with improvements in subjective outcome measures. Changes in self-perceived hearing and HRQoL post-implantation seem independent of pre- and post-implantation hearing performance. Conclusion: These results suggest that while patients regain their hearing abilities shortly after implant activation, their subjective hearing-related benefits and QoL improve over time.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.