SynthesisFrontiers in neurology2025
Effect of vestibular rehabilitation therapy in patients with persistent postural perceptual dizziness: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in Frontiers in neurology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Treatment of Functional Neurological Disorders.Journal of clinical neurology (Seoul, Korea) · 2026Review
- Vestibular Rehabilitation for Post-Concussive Vestibular Dysfunction: Pathophysiology, Evidence-Based Practice, and Future Perspectives.Korean journal of neurotrauma · 2026Review
- Evolution of Research on Persistent Postural-Perceptual Dizziness: A Bibliometric and Visualization Analysis from 1994 to 2025.Audiology research · 2026Review
- Attentional dysfunction in persistent postural-perceptual dizziness: a narrative review of mechanistic evidence.Frontiers in neurology · 2026Review
- Persistent postural-perceptual dizziness: a phenotype-oriented approach to practical management.Frontiers in neurology · 2026Review
- Neurotransmitter regulatory networks in persistent postural-perceptual dizziness: potential mechanisms and therapeutic implications.Frontiers in neurology · 2026Review
- Effect of Vestibular Rehabilitation Therapy in PPPD: Short-Term Results from a Prospective Observational Study.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- The referral-to-attendance gap in vestibular rehabilitation: a retrospective cohort study in diverse South Florida patients.Frontiers in neurologyArticle
- Combined biofeedback and vestibular rehabilitation therapy for vestibular migraine: clinical efficacy and neurobiochemical correlates.Frontiers in neurologyArticle
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Persistent Postural-Perceptual Dizziness (PPPD) is an increasingly recognized syndrome defined by enduring experiences of dizziness, unbalance, or non-vertiginous dizziness, generally persisting for a minimum of 3 months. This condition significantly impacts patients' quality of life, highlighting the necessity for prompt and effective management. Vestibular rehabilitation therapy (VRT) has demonstrated efficacy in alleviating dizzy symptoms and enhancing balance. This meta-analysis seeks to assess the effectiveness of VRT in alleviating subjective dizzy symptoms and improving postural control in persons with PPPD. Methods: Two reviewers independently searched electronic databases (PubMed, EMBASE, SCOPUS, and the Cochrane Library) for pertinent studies investigating VRT for PPPD. Studies employing the Dizziness Handicap Inventory (DHI) as an assessment tool were included, provided they were extracted and presented in English from inception to March 7, 2025. Eight papers were included into this meta-analysis. Results: The aggregated weighted mean difference (WMD) indicated substantially improved outcomes for PPPD patients who underwent VRT compared to the control group in DHI-total scores (WMD = 21.84, 95% CI: [10.97, 32.71]). In subgroup analysis, DHI-total score improvements were observed in both customized VRT (WMD = 21.06, 95% CI: [5.65, 36.47]) and virtual reality-based VRT groups (WMD = 23.77, 95% CI: [8.09, 39.45]). Detailed data for DHI-Physical (DHI-P), Emotional (DHI-E), and Functional (DHI-F) scores from five trials (442 individuals) indicated a substantial reduction among PPPD patients receiving VRT (DHI-P: WMD = 17.92, 95% CI: [6.47, 29.38]; DHI-E: WMD = 10.51, 95% CI: [0.83, 20.19]; DHI-F: WMD = 15.00, 95% CI: [6.28, 23.72]). Conclusion: VRT can provide improvement for patients with PPPD, especially in DHI-total scores, DHI-P, DHI-E and DHI-F scores. Customized VRT demonstrated superior therapeutic efficacy compared with virtual reality-based VRT. However, additional randomized controlled trials are necessary to substantiate and inform the utilization of VRT in the treatment of PPPD.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.