ReviewJournal of orthopaedics2025
Systematic review of valgus intertrochanteric osteotomy in the setting of femoral neck fractures.
Review in Journal of orthopaedics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Functional Outcomes of Valgus Osteotomy in Young Patients of Intracapsular Neck of Femur Fracture: A Case Series.Journal of orthopaedic case reports · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Valgus intertrochanteric osteotomy (VITO) is a fixation procedure to manage neglected femoral neck fractures (FNF) in young adults. While several studies have evaluated the efficacy of VITO, there remains variability in intraoperative technique and fixation devices. The study aims to systematically review the current orthopedic literature to summarize the patient outcomes and determine the efficacy of VITO in young adults with neglected FNFs. Methods: All peer-reviewed studies written in English about VITO for neglected FNFs from 2000 to 2022 were searched using the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) PubMed MEDLINE database. Exclusion criteria included meta-analyses without primary data, single-patient case reports, and studies investigating pediatric populations. All included articles were analyzed for patient demographic data, Pauwels Classification, average time from injury to surgery and follow up, implant type, union versus nonunion, postoperative complications, need for corrective procedures, and surgical instrumentation utilized. Results: Eighteen articles that collectively provided data on 481 patients who underwent VITO were included. Most patients (66 %) included in this study had a Pauwels Type III. The most notable postoperative complication was osteonecrosis, which had an incidence of 8.3 %. Union was achieved in 92 % of cases at a mean follow-up of 48.6 months. Conclusion: VITO is a reliable and effective surgery to address nonunion of FNF in the young adult population. While the intraoperative device and correctional procedure used varied slightly, the majority of patients had an excellent postoperative Harris Hip Score (HHS) and achieved union by the last follow-up visit. Level of evidence: Level IV.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.