ArticleOsteoarthritis and cartilage open2025
A proteomics investigation of primary human articular chondrocyte isolation.
Article in Osteoarthritis and cartilage open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Omics Studies in Osteoarthritis: A Review of Molecular Mechanisms and Candidate Molecules.Biomolecules · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: Human primary articular chondrocytes (hPACs) are routinely isolated from articular cartilage for pre-clinical OA research. Collagenase digest of tissue is an essential step, yet the impact of lengthy enzymatic incubation on the hPAC phenotype is unclear. We aimed to delineate this through proteomic analysis. Design: hPACs were isolated from human knee cartilage (n = 4) from patients undergoing total knee replacement. Collagenase treatment was performed with or without prior fixation of the tissue. Proteomes were quantified using LC-MS/MS. The Proteomic Ruler was employed to estimate protein copy numbers and cell protein masses. Significant differences in protein intensities were determined using paired t-testing and Benjamini-Hochberg correction. Proteomic data were integrated with existing transcriptomes (GSE217871) of hPACs and ground cartilage ( Results: Following collagenase treatment, we identified 498 differentially expressed proteins (DEP) in the unfixed cells. We observed depletion of FOXO signaling and enrichment of ribosomal RNA processing, indicative of increased cell cycle progression. This was supported by depletion of cell cycle inhibitors including CDKN1C. Transcriptomic analysis identified 3937 differentially expressed genes (DEG), and a 53 % overlap in DEP and DEG. Propidium iodide staining did not identify significant differences in cell cycle between fixed and unfixed hPACs. Conclusions: We identified shifts in the proteome and transcriptome of hPACs following collagenase digest, supporting the use of tissue fixation before extracting nucleic acids for analysis where possible. Despite widespread expression changes, hPACs largely retain their chondrocyte phenotype. These datasets and analyses will serve as a valuable resource for the OA and cartilage research community.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.