Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41069373›Full record

ReviewRSC advances2025

Progress in the design of ascorbic acid derivative-mediated drug delivery.

Caroline Lamie, Enas Elmowafy, Dalia A Attia, Nahed D Mortada

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in RSC advances, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Caroline LamieDepartment of Pharmaceutics and Pharmaceutical Technology, The British University in Egypt Cairo Egypt 11837.
Enas ElmowafyDepartment of Pharmaceutics and Industrial Pharmacy, Faculty of Pharmacy, Ain Shams University Monazzamet Elwehda Elafrikeya Street, Abbaseyya Cairo Egypt 11566 Enasmostafa@pharma.asu.edu.eg (+202)01140380412.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0252-9878
Dalia A AttiaDepartment of Pharmaceutics and Pharmaceutical Technology, The British University in Egypt Cairo Egypt 11837.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6352-582X
Nahed D MortadaDepartment of Pharmaceutics and Industrial Pharmacy, Faculty of Pharmacy, Ain Shams University Monazzamet Elwehda Elafrikeya Street, Abbaseyya Cairo Egypt 11566 Enasmostafa@pharma.asu.edu.eg (+202)01140380412.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Antioxidant-based pharmaceutical products are currently experiencing a surge in popularity and satisfaction, demonstrating promising preclinical and clinical prospects. These products exert their beneficial effects by displaying protection against mischievous free radicals. One potent antioxidant is ascorbic acid (AA), which plays numerous crucial biochemical roles and is typically distinguished as a primary hydrophilic, non-enzymatic antioxidant in tissues. AA is a water-soluble essential antioxidant vitamin that can only be obtained from the diet. However, AA's instability, coupled with challenges related to its delivery, has presented formulation challenges for chemists. As a result, various stable hydrophilic and lipophilic derivatizations of AA have been devised. Capitalizing on their potential, delivery platforms, particularly nano-sized ones utilizing ascorbic acid derivatives, have been extensively investigated in recent years. Two such derivatives, namely, ascorbyl-6-palmitate (AP; a lipophilic derivative) and ascorbyl-2-glucoside (AA-2G; a hydrophilic derivative), have been extensively studied in previous works. Herein, the scientific data related to their utilization, either as a drug or as an integral component in delivery vehicles, and their pharmaceutical applications are evaluated.

Identifiers

PMID41069373
PMCPMC12505347

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.