Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41069350›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical and translational science2025

Evaluation means making CQI collaborative (E = MC

Ariel Y Fishman, David Lounsbury, Claudia Lechuga, Jessica Kahn, Mimi Y Kim, Marla Keller

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical and translational science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Ariel Y FishmanHarold and Muriel Block Institute for Clinical and Translational Research, Albert Einstein College of Medicine and Montefiore Medical Center, Bronx, NY, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0317-1169
David LounsburyHarold and Muriel Block Institute for Clinical and Translational Research, Albert Einstein College of Medicine and Montefiore Medical Center, Bronx, NY, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8539-4659
Claudia LechugaHarold and Muriel Block Institute for Clinical and Translational Research, Albert Einstein College of Medicine and Montefiore Medical Center, Bronx, NY, USA.
Jessica KahnHarold and Muriel Block Institute for Clinical and Translational Research, Albert Einstein College of Medicine and Montefiore Medical Center, Bronx, NY, USA.
Mimi Y KimHarold and Muriel Block Institute for Clinical and Translational Research, Albert Einstein College of Medicine and Montefiore Medical Center, Bronx, NY, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9651-7124
Marla KellerHarold and Muriel Block Institute for Clinical and Translational Research, Albert Einstein College of Medicine and Montefiore Medical Center, Bronx, NY, USA.

Funding

Einstein-Montefiore Clinical and Translational Science Award HubUM1TR004400 · NCATS · ALBERT EINSTEIN COLLEGE OF MEDICINE · PI Jessica Kahn, Mimi Y Kim · 2023 to 2026
$17.3M
NCATS NIH HHS UM1 TR004400
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The NIH's Clinical and Translational Science Award (CTSA) program has placed greater emphasis on Continuous Quality Improvement (CQI) in recent years. Our institution's CTSA-supported Institute for Clinical and Translational Research (ICTR) implemented a novel CQI process in response. This manuscript shares lessons learned from our implementation, reflecting a paradigm shift from managing an "evaluation program" to creating a process whose central goal is CQI. Our objective is to share these reflections to support other CTSA hubs' efforts to successfully implement CQI programs. Key elements of our implementation included (1) establishing a shared understanding about CQI's purpose; (2) leveraging a centralized management approach while addressing barriers to implementation; and (3) creating structures that foster collaboration. The CQI framework we chose, FACE (Focus, Analyze, Change, Evaluate), enabled us not only to improve the activities of ICTR modules but also, over time, to refine the CQI process itself. Through regular convenings of module leaders, the ICTR has sought to cultivate a culture of CQI as a dynamic, participatory process that supports mutual learning and collective problem-solving.

Indexed as

continuous quality ImprovementEvaluationNCATSreflexive inquirystrategic management

Identifiers

PMID41069350
PMCPMC12505234

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.