Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41069187›Full record

ArticleJournal of food science2025

Toward Sustainable Food and Packaging Choices: Consumer Perception of Quality and Sustainability of Pulses Packaged in Metal, Glass, and Plastic.

Lauren Thomas, Nomzamo N Dlamini, Karen Cichy, Jeffrey Swada, Emily J Mayhew

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of food science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Lauren ThomasDepartment of Food Science and Human Nutrition, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan, USA.
Nomzamo N DlaminiDepartment of Consumer and Food Sciences, University of Pretoria, Pretoria, South Africa.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8374-4248
Karen CichyDepartment of Plant Soil and Microbial Sciences, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan, USA.
Jeffrey SwadaDepartment of Food Science and Human Nutrition, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8473-0390
Emily J MayhewDepartment of Food Science and Human Nutrition, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7881-2306

Funding

Agricultural Research Service 5050-21430-012-000-D
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Dry beans and other pulses have many environmental, nutritional, and health benefits-yet are continuously undervalued by consumers. Barriers to pulse consumption extend to ready-to-eat (RTE) canned options, as they are viewed as a low-quality food. Additionally, consumers currently have misperceptions related to food packaging sustainability, as glass sustainability is overestimated, while plastic sustainability is underestimated, despite the sustainability of food packaging being very multifaceted. This study aimed to understand the impact of packaging on the acceptance (overall, appearance, texture, flavor liking) of RTE yellow beans and chickpeas within metal can, glass jar, and plastic pouch packaging. Perceptions of the product quality, product convenience, trust in product, and perceived sustainability of each product and packaging were also assessed, along with how consumers' sustainability attitudes and demographics influenced packaging attribute responses. Blind-coded serving samples processed within metal cans performed the most consistently for participants (n = 109) across sensory modalities, while yellow beans within plastic pouches and chickpeas within glass jars were least preferred. Glass jars were rated to be the highest quality and most sustainable packaging material, while plastic pouches were rated to be lowest quality and least sustainable, with most participants selecting to purchase the glass jar over the metal can or plastic pouch. Age, diet type, and certain sustainability attitudes were significant (p < 0.05) predictors of packaging attribute ratings. Results from this study can contribute to innovation and improvements to RTE pulse products, while also expressing a need for increased consumer education pertaining to packaging sustainability. PRACTICAL APPLICATIONS: This study provides a better understanding of consumer perceptions related to retort-processed pulse products, food packaging materials, and food packaging sustainability. This will allow for possible innovation opportunities to increase the availability and acceptability of pulses, a sustainable and nutritious food, as well as combat misconceptions related to food packaging sustainability.

Indexed as

Consumer BehaviorFood PackagingAdolescentAdultFemaleFood PreferencesFood QualityGlassHumansMaleMiddle AgedPlasticsTasteYoung AdultPlastics

Identifiers

PMID41069187
PMCPMC12511835

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.