ArticleAnnals of medicine2025
Effectiveness of metabolic management centers online tools in patients with type 2 diabetes.
Article in Annals of medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Letter to the Editor regarding "Effectiveness of metabolic management centers online tools in patients with type 2 diabetes".Annals of medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesTo assess the value of National Metabolic Management Centers (MMC) specialized online tools, for the maintenance of metabolic control among patients with type 2 diabetes (T2DM). PATIENTS: This retrospective study enrolled T2DM patients from 10 MMCs (June 2017-April 2021) and divided into non- and application of online tools (non-AOT and AOT) groups. MEASUREMENTS: Propensity score matching (PSM) was used to balance the characteristics of patients between groups. The effect of online tools was evaluated by the change in HbA1c, with additional stratified analyses in subgroups.
resultsAfter PSM, 12528 patients with T2DM were followed for a median of 15.88 (7.10, 24.27) months, the AOT group demonstrated better control of HbA1c (-0.90 [-2.60, 0.00] % vs. -0.70 [-2.20, 0.10] %,
conclusionsMMC online tools significantly improve metabolic outcomes, particularly for T2DM patients with younger age, lower education levels or poor baseline HbA1c control. They offer a scalable and effective model for out-of-hospital diabetes care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.